People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak Puns

She stated in her latest tweet this change of her title. ( https://twitter.com/ContraPoints/status/929795733255020545 )

I still advocated for: Queen Natalie I, arch-daemonette of Slaneesh, enemy of the Imperium, victress over the Akkadians and the frog people, intellectual leader of left side of YouTube and arch-prophetress of the Dark Mother; as her full royal title.

But instead of discussing her full royal title we now need to discuss the revolutionary goals of her party.

I created some propaganda to celebrate this historic event. https://orig00.deviantart.net/4478/f/2017/316/1/3/leaderviewersunite_by_radicalneurodiverse-dbtkjw5.png

FORWARD. VIEWERS UNITE!

Something is terribly wrong, theoretically and practically, with the CPP/NPA/NDF’s people’s democratic revolutionary line, which is being blindly parroted by their legal fronts in all propaganda discourses everywhere. Worse, this political line, as absurdly applied in the Philippine context, has been reaffirmed twice in a row -- firstly, in the Reaffirm document of Joema Sison and the so-called great rectification movement in the early 1990s, and secondly, during their avowed second party congress in the late 2016, which is certainly without the benefit of a deeper theoretical and practical scrutiny. This only further belies their supposed adherence to the Marxist--Leninist (supplemented by Maoist) theory of revolution and reveals their Marxist theoretical inadequacy.

The Philippines has long been freed from the shackles of autocracy, monarchy and/or absolutism as experienced during the Spanish colonialism. The country was then an extension of the absolute sovereign rule of the Spanish king -- utterly repressive and without political liberty, so to speak. The quest for complete political liberty and the establishment of the bourgeois democratic liberal republic has long been achieved partly with the proclamation of the First Philippine Republic by Emilio Aguinaldo in 1898. Complete political liberty, however, was cut short by the brutal American colonization. Just the same, the formal bourgeois liberal republic, with all its trimmings, was in nominal operation under the American tutelage who professed themselves to be the beacon of Jeffersonian liberalism, as opposed to the ‘ancient regime’ associated with Spanish monarchy. The material basis for the democratic revolutionary line, as formulated by proletarian revolutionaries at the turn of the century and adopted by Joema Season in the 1960’s, was such that the bourgeois democratic revolution waged by the Katipunan was unfinished and undercut by the American colonization which perpetuated a semi-feudal agrarian arrangement in the countryside. While professing “to educate the Filipinos in the art of democracy,” the Americans define their liberalism and political liberty to mean subservience to American imperialism until formal independence and actual liberal democratic rule by Filipino bourgeoisie was inaugurated in 1946.

Such formal independence signaled the victory of bourgeois liberal democracy in the country, notwithstanding its infirmities. It was won not without intense struggle involving not only t

Jordan Peterson has been growing in popularity in the YT community and has the potential to make a lot of people into crypto neo traditionalists. I hope that our Glorious Leader of the Revolutionary People's Party can issue a take down video.

Following the controversial actions by the Lao Front for National Construction in Savannakhét Province last month, an extraordinary Congress of the People's Revolutionary Party has been held before the next primary Congress in 2031. The agenda consisted of whether the party officially condoned the actions of the LFNC, and what this meant for the country as a whole.

General Secretary Keahi Pakdimounivong put forth his position, that the world would continue to laugh at Laos and trade would become more and more difficult as more and more eyes turn to the nation if people were constantly and consistently pressured, arrested or "murdered" if they refuse to legally change their religion.

Meanwhile, several voices purportedly within the Secretariat for General Intelligence stated dissatisfaction, though exact statements prove hard to find.

The Central Military Committee of the Lao People's Revolutionary Party and the Lao People's Committee for National Defence and Security have been formed by the Central Committee of the LPRP as a way of securing control of the Lao People's Armed Forces firmly in the hands of the vanguard of the people. This effectively removes from the President of Laos their position as Commander-in-Chief, though they remain head of state.

The Central Military Committee of the LPRP is the Party body responsible for organising the Party policy on the armed forces. The CMCLPRP will be elected at Party Congress'. The Lao People's Committee for National Defence and Security will act as the combined Commander-in-Chief of the Lao People's Armed Forces. The LPCNDS will be elected by the National Assembly. In reality, the Central Military Committee of the LPRP will hold full control of the armed forces.

Membership of the CMCLPRP is as follows, as determined by the Central Committee:

Executive Secretary:

• Keon Keothavong, General Secretary of the Lao People's Revolutionary Party

Deputy Secretaries:

• Havika Saysamongdy
• Lt. Gen. Sonxai Sayavong

Members:

• Brig. Gen. Phonesavanh Phothisarath
• Brig. Gen. Lilo Sayasone
• Brig. Gen. Oke Phengsavath

Membership of the LPCNDS is as follows, as determined by the National Assembly:

Chairman:

• Keon Keothavong

Deputy Chairmen:

• Havika Saysamongdy, Minister for Defence
• Lt. Gen. Sonxai Sayavong

Members:

• Brig. Gen. Kale Rattanavongsa
• Brig. Gen. Wongduan Phengsavath
• Col. Malo Champasack
• Col. Bane Douangvily
• Col. Teyvada Phomvihane

[M] Last guy didn't post anything about leadership for the six days he was Laos so I've gone with this. Let me know if that's not okay.

#2021 - 11th Congress of the Lao People's Revolutionary Party

The 11th Congress saw Bounnhang Vorachith, elected General Secretary of the LPRP by the 10th Congress and President by the National Assembly in 2016, not seek re-election, signalling retirement. Palani Khamkhenh was elected as General Secretary of the LPRP, Phankham Viphavan was re-elected as Executive Secretary of the Secretariat and Songkram Bouphavanh as Chairman of the Inspection Committee.

Nine people were elected to the Politburo and eight to the Secretariat.

♀ indicates that the individual is female.

§ indicates that the individual is military personnel.

The primary topic of discussion was the economy, which has continued to grow at a steady pace. However, the 8th National Socio-Economic Development Plan has clearly failed to be implemented, and so the 9th National Socio-Economic Development Plan will be written up and presented at the 12th Party Congress.

#2026 - 12th Congress of the Lao People's Revolutionary Party

The 12th Party Congress saw a slight shakeup in the ranking of the Politburo. Palani Khamkhenh was replaced by Keahi Pakdimounivong, andNoi Phothisarath by Ulani Sengtavisouk. The Secretariat was also shaken up. Finally, the Inspection Committee of the Party Central Committee was "refreshed".

♀ indicates that the individual is female.

§ indicates that the individual is military personnel.

Inspection Committee of the Party Central Committee

1. Songkram Bouphavanh

His Marxist–Leninist theories, military strategies, and political policies are collectively known as Maoism or Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.

Born the son of a wealthy farmer in Shaoshan, Hunan, Mao adopted a Chinese nationalist and anti-imperialist outlook in early life, particularly influenced by the events of the Xinhai Revolution of 1911 and May Fourth Movement of 1919. Mao adopted Marxism–Leninism while working at Peking University and became a founding member of the Communist Party of China (CPC), leading the Autumn Harvest Uprising in 1927. During the Chinese Civil War between the Guomindang (GMD) and the CPC, Mao helped to found the Red Army, led the Jiangxi Soviet's radical land policies and ultimately became head of the CPC during the Long March. Although the CPC temporarily allied with the GMD under the United Front during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–45), after Japan's defeat China's civil war resumed and in 1949 Mao's forces defeated the Nationalists who withdrew to Taiwan.

On October 1, 1949, Mao proclaimed the foundation of the People's Republic of China (PRC), a one-party state controlled by the CPC. In the following years Mao solidified his control through land reform campaigns against landlords, and perceived enemies of the state he termed as "counter-revolutionaries". In 1957, he launched the Great Leap Forward campaign that aimed to rapidly transform China's economy from an agrarian economy to an industrial one. The campaign contributed to a widespread famine, whose death toll is estimated at between 15 and 45 million. In 1966, he initiated the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, a program to remove "counter-revolutionary" elements of Chinese society that lasted 10 years and which was marked by violent class struggle, widespread destruction of cultural artifacts and unprecedented elevation of Mao's personality cult. In 1972, Mao welcomed American President Richard Nixon in Beijing, signalling a policy of opening China, which was furthered under the rule of Deng Xiaoping (1978–1992). Mao suffered a series of heart attacks in 1976, dying in that September, aged 82. He was succeeded as Paramount leader by Hua Guofeng (1976–1978), who was quickly sidelined and replaced by Deng.

A controversial figure, Mao is regarded as one of the most important individuals in modern world history, and is also known as a theorist, military strategist, poet and visionary. Supporters credit him with driving imperialism out of China, modernising China an

Bernie Sanders calls himself a Democratic Socialist (DS), whereas, by choosing to work within the existing two-party system and the democratic institutions he's actually more of a Social Democrat (SD). If so, this would make Sanders' policies less hostile to Capitalism than people imagine.

The main difference between DS and SD is that the latter does not believe in violence or revolution to achieve a more equitable society. What Beatrice Web called, 'the inevitability of gradualness'.

SDs believe in gradual and incremental change of existing institutions rather than violent upheavals.

They believe that Capitalism and Socialism can coexist, and, that each has its own function.

Most importantly, while both SD's & DS's believe in equality of opportunity SD's do not believe equality of output.

The examples most often quoted of SD's are the developed economies of Western Europe and Scandinavia. They not only exhibit a healthy dose of capitalistic entrepreneurship and business friendly practices, but, also have some of the most stringent and equitable standards when it comes to regulation of markets, environment, agriculture, workspaces etc.

So, claims of being a Socialist or a Communist shouldn't stick.

An important milestone in modern Cambodian history.

https://preview.redd.it/38o47bqfzu631.jpg?width=267&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=03ce6ed8d8a5dc68d710fa8abf07e16fd3a9df79

https://cne.wtf/2019/06/27/khmer-peoples-revolutionary-party-established-june-28-1951-part-1/