https://twitter.com/rapsheet/status/1477806241028218884?s=21
Just a shower thought. In my opinion, sacrifice and out of time both give me a major Michael Jackson vibe.
Vaush mentioned he will soon be debating E Michael Jones (Catholic Nazi) on pornography. Hopefully Vaush mentions the fact that the ‘Bible Belt’ regions of America consume more porn than anywhere else in the US. Links:
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.maxim.com/maxim-man/religious-people-watch-the-most-porn-2017-3/amp/ (2017)
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/psmag.com/.amp/news/evangelical-porn-viewing-on-the-rise (2018)
It should be a good and interesting debate!
A few days ago I came across what seemed to be a direct quote from Quincy about a time he snapped during a recording session and yelled in Michael's face, triggering some sort of flashback moment for Michael where he sort of checked out. This happened in front of Bruce Swedien as well and once Quincy kind of realized Michael wasn't reacting and that his eyes were sort of unfocused/ not there he touched his shoulder which caused Michael to snap out of it and throw his arm up as if to protect himself from a strike.
I cannot find this story anywhere online so I'm wondering if anyone else has documentation for when this happened/ if it happened?
https://youtu.be/3IRyjNDVv3s
These are not dumbass propagandists they are an organized group of far right wing propagandists trying to turn people into hyper nationalist/right wing idealogues.
I seriously don’t know why Kyle Kulinski still sees this guy as a friend, look who he associates with regularly. All the other (honest) new media people have called Rogan and his network for what it is.
This is 2.5 hours of unhinged hysteria about every right wing concern of the current season.
Aired two hours ago and already has 500k+ views.
These people are fucked.
there is a probability that in the song with Quincy Jones there may be Michael Jackson as an invisible and surprise feature, as happened with the features in DONDA. Months of theories and clues that The Weeknd would make a song with Michael and at this point this may be the only probability. How the world would explode saying "Michael Jackson is on The Weeknd's song with Quincy Jones producing" that would make everyone go listen to the song to see if it's true. It is a very good marketing strategy. Whether it's true or not, the simple fact of a song with Quincy Jones is an achievement and it has me very excited. What do you think, would you like it to be like this?
View on Site
Weekly, I'll be posting this RBBC analysis alongside my Redzone Look Trends post
Notes:
-
I GET IT NAJEE AND EKELER ARE A MISTAKE
-
Purpose: Examine backfield trends from the previous weeks
-
Target Share and RZ Share are only relative to FBs/RBs on the team. Data is adjusted for injuries
-
Source: https://subscribers.footballguys.com/teams/teampage-den-3.php
-
#Reply with a team name if you want to just see their breakdown of W/R/T #ARI Player|AVG Snap %|RZ Looks Per Game|RZ Looks Share|Targets Per Game|RB Target Share :--|:--|:--|:--|:--|:-- chase edmonds|61.0% (+3.0%)|1.5 (-0.5)|37.5% (+4.2%)|4.5 (+0.5)|100.0% (0%) james conner|44.0% (-5.0%)|2.5 (-1.5)|62.5% (-4.2%)|0.0 (-)|0.0% (0%)
#ATL
| Player | AVG Snap % | RZ Looks Per Game | RZ Looks Share | Targets Per Game | RB Target Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cordarrelle patterson | 33.0% (0%) | 2.5 (+1.5) | 50.0% (+33.3%) | 4.0 (+2.0) | 32.0% (+13.8%) |
| mike davis | 69.5% (-5.5%) | 2.5 (-2.5) | 50.0% (-33.3%) | 6.5 (+0.5) | 52.0% (-2.5%) |
| keith smith | 27.0% (-2.0%) | 0.0 (-) | 0.0% (0%) | 2.0 (-1.0) | 16.0% (-11.3%) |
#BAL
| Player | AVG Snap % | RZ Looks Per Game | RZ Looks Share | Targets Per Game | RB Target Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tyson williams | 50.0% (-1.0%) | 2.0 (+1.0) | 50.0% (0%) | 3.0 (-1.0) | 100.0% (0%) |
| latavius murray | 33.5% (+2.5%) | 2.0 (+1.0) | 50.0% (0%) | 0.0 (-) | 0.0% (0%) |
| devonta freeman | 13.0% (+13.0%) | 0.0 (-) | 0.0% (0%) | 0.0 (-) | 0.0% (0%) |
#BUF
| Player | AVG Snap % | RZ Looks Per Game | RZ Looks Share | Targets Per Game | RB Target Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| devin singletary | 70.5% (-4.5%) | 2.5 (+0.5) | 45.5% (-54.5%) | 4.0 (-1.0) | 80.0% (-20.0%) |
| matt breida | 7.5% (-4.5%) | 0.0 (-) | 0.0% (0%) | 0.0 (-) | 0.0% (0%) |
| zack moss | 28.0% (+28.0%) | 4.0 (+4.0) | 44.4% (+44.4%) | 2.0 (+2.0) | 40.0% (+40.0%) |
#CAR
| Player | AVG Snap % | RZ Looks Per Game | RZ Looks Share | Targets Per Game | RB Target Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| christian mccaffrey | 80.0% (-9.0%) | 6.5 (+0.5) | 100.0% (0%) | 7.5 (-1.5) | 88.2% (+6.4%) |
| chuba hubbard | 18.0% (+7.0%) | 0.0 (-) | 0.0% (0%) | 1.0 (-1.0) | 11.8% (-6.4%) |
#CHI
| Player | AVG Snap % | RZ Looks Per Game | RZ Looks Share | Targets Per Game | RB Target Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| david montgomery | 69.5% (+10.5%) | 3.0 (+1.0) | 75.0% (+25.0%) | 2.5 (+1.5) | 38.5% (+21.8%) |
| damien williams | 33.0% (-10.0%) | 1.0 (-1.0) | 25.0% (-25. |
https://youtu.be/ZfQzLmT1Rbs
I've recently finished 'Living Machines: Bauhaus architecture as sexual ideology', and read some of his work 'Degenerate Moderns' which addresses modern art and sociology. The other volume in his trilogy on modernism is 'Dionysos Rising' discussing music history.
https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Living_Machines.html?id=yt8iJQAsm-QC&redir_esc=y
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=n4gunqNF8MwC&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22E.+Michael+Jones%22&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=6xFarBgmCcMC&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22E.+Michael+Jones%22&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
The idea of his work is that modernist aesthetics, architecture, and political ideologies are driven by the sexual immorality (such as incest and adultery) of their founders and theorists. This includes Freud, Gropius, Van Der Rohe, Margaret Mead, Picasso (and cubism), Stanley Fish, Kinsey, Le Corbusier, and others.
In addition, he concludes that both in theory and practice, modernism was corrupt and harmful. The Architecture was inefficient and alienating, as well as authoritarian and geared towards unhealthy sexual liberation. Modernist music is/was degenerative and based upon perverse desires. Cubism depicted sexual perversion on the part of its creator. Psychoanalysis rationalised sexual misbehaviour on the part of Freud and Jung. Etc.
How accurate is E. Michael Jones on this topic? What are the appraisals and what are the refutations out there, and how do they hold up?
Extra life Michael is willing to do anything in the name of charity and it's so funny. Eat a pokemon card or get shit by paint balls it's for da children
