You will be able to train Pokémon to learn to Gigantimax on the Isle of Armor. Is mustard is Leon’s mentor, I bet mustard knows how to unlock gmax potential. He helped Leon with his starter, and will help us with ours (and kubfu). I also think that we may be able to add the ability to gmax to any Pokémon through some sort of time gate or mini repeatable story.
They would never make us replace our starters just to get a gmax form, so that’s a given, and I truly believe Leon’s undefeatable charizard, Charizard of the undefeatbale champion Leon probably learned to gmax from mustard, and maybe taught our Charmander how to as we’ll
The talk is supposed to be about 50 minutes, and let's define "graduate level algebra" as knowing Groups, Rings, Modules, Fields, and Galois Theory. Also, what's a good reference for such a topic?
In an effort to make better tracks by focusing on composition first and foremost, I've been learning about all the following facets of music theory:
Meter, Tempo, Keys, Scales/Modes, Intervals, Motives, Phrases, Themes, Counterpoint, Variations, Triads, Extended Chords, Modal Interchange, Tritone Substitution, Inversions, Voice Leading, Chord Progressions, Cadences, Secondary Dominants, Modulation
What have I overlooked? Also, what tools have you found most useful in differentiating your writing style?
Statements and Theories posted on rASOIAF vs. Westeros in the past day where the subject matter of the original post is not actually the poster stating a question, rather, primarily a statement or theory:
rASOIAF:
vs.
Westeros.org:
Is there some reason I don't know about as to why we can't pose as many statements and long winded theories as questions? Is there just a downtime in question posting on reddit? Will we see an adjustment made in the future? Do I hope so?
Liouville's theorem and the refinements made by Thue, Siegel and Roth are presented in most sources about transcendental number theory. There is also a quote from Gelfond: "All methods of proof of the transcendence of a number ... depend on the fact that algebraic numbers cannot be very well approximated by rational fractions...". Where in the proofs of transcendental number theory (especially the ones leading up to Gelfond-Schneider) is that fact hidden? And does that mean that transcendental numbers in general can be better approximated by rational numbers than algebraic ones in a certain way?
With the emails and more data coming out it looks like the story is taking shape. Enough to put forth an theory of what happened.
Fauci and the rest of the scientists knew early on that it was possible this was a lab leak. In fact even before the event itself they already wrote articles saying that this was a risk of gain a function research but a risk that was well worth taking.
Fauci and the rest of the medical establishment particularly those involved in virology covered it up because if it was known that this plague did come from a research lab it would have a similar effect to Cheronobyl and nuclear energy and funding would dry up.
Democrats and their media allies went along with it because it was in their political interest to do so because it was better to blame Trump than the scientists who allowed this research.
Do you think this theory of events holds water?
I AM GOING TO PREFACE THIS BY STATING THIS PLAINLY: THE WIDELY ACCEPTED THEORY, THAT THE EVENTS OF UNDERTALE TAKE PLACE OUTSIDE THE DECADE OF 201X, IS NOT PROVABLE. IT IS ENTIRELY POSSIBLE THAT THE EVENTS OF UNDERTALE TAKE PLACE WITHIN THE SAME DECADE THAT CHARA FELL. PLEASE DO NOT USE THIS AS COUNTER EVIDENCE TO THIS THEORY. I WILL BE ABLE TO DISPROVE YOU.
.
Evidence used for the conclusions below:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/14sy6hiokP0SY83aZDF163eu6UpndWv6A/view?usp=sharing Here's the primary theory write up. It contains logical connections and the crux of the theory.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jW0AZF-2aeRpzaL291Z6uxEmuf0zpXH-/view?usp=sharing Here's a write up that uses Kris and Snowdrake's status as teenagers to establish a hypothetical timeline between the time the monsters are underground and the time that Deltarune begins.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_YwiH6z-csBe-gK1sUyZU_1HpHD-TwoJ/view?usp=sharing Here's assorted evidence I came up with on Discord. A line of hyphens signifies a different set of evidence screencaps. This evidence shows various things, but may be slightly out of order.
.
CONCLUSIONS OF MY THEORIZING
1: Deltarune takes place in the FUTURE of an alternate universe Undertale, in which the only variable that is changed between the original Undertale and the Alternate Universe Undertale is that Chara does not exist. The monsters were sealed underground in the past of the Deltarune timeline just like they were in Undertale.
1b: Based upon my research, the timespan between the day the barrier was broken in the Deltarune timeline, and the day that the Deltarune game takes place is about 5-6 years.
1c: Kris was indeed a character in Undertale, albeit an unnamed and unseen one. They were the owner of the Light Blue SOUL of Patience, and the first child that Asgore killed. In the Deltarune timeline, Kris was the first human to fall into the Underground, and they were adopted by the Dreemurrs.
1d: The barrier was broken by 7 LIVING humans in the Deltarune timeline: Kris, Frisk and the other 5 unnamed humans. Frisk and the other 5 humans are the humans that the player does not recognize in the library book on the care of Humans. These other human children were likely adopted by other monster families and/or returned to their human families when the barrier was broken.
.
2: Gaster's significance to Deltarune is that he is performing an experiment where he pits someone with the power to chan
... keep reading on reddit ➡
Hello, everyone!
I'm in the last semester of my undergrad and am taking Number Theory, and to be frank it's been quite a disappointment. Our professor is just so shockingly bad, it's by far the worst experience I've had these three years. Since he can't offer me much help, I wanted to ask if some of you could help me.
I have an assignment to turn in next week and have to pick a topic for it. I really like computer science and a bit of cryptography so it'd be great if I could explore a bit of the applications of Number Theory in those areas, but I'm not sure what would be fitting for my knowledge (especially considering that I'm struggling with this course, sadly). I was thinking maybe something about elliptic curve cryptography or quantum cryptography, but I'm not sure if I'm being delusional about the difficulty of these subjects. I would only explore it on a superficial level, of course, but it can't be too easy because it's going to be graded harshly, and at the same time I can't pick something too difficult because I don't have much time left to do it.
Do you have any suggestion about an interesting topic that I could explore (could be a paper, a chapter of a book, anything)? Or maybe another website where I could try and find something? Even if it's not related to what I mentioned. Thank you so much in advance.
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 91%. (I'm a bot)
> "The successful macro-investor must be some magical mixture of an acute analyst, an investment scholar, a listener, a historian, a river boat gambler, and be a voracious reader - reading is crucial" ~ Barton Biggs.
> History, investing strategies, philosophy, risk, complex systems, politics, biology/ecology, and everything else.... Many who know me have seen my huge library of physical books I have in my house and the stacks of books all over.
> I believe that a good investing book should be - above all else - practical.
> Most are just noise and useless theory that doesn't do anything for the reader long term.
> As an investor and reader, I want original ideas that have actionable advice so I can better my strategies and benefit from it.
> Nowhere else will you find such a large and resourceful book list.... - Adem Tumerkan, Editor in Chief.
Summary Source | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: book^#1 reader^#2 else^#3 list^#4 practical^#5
Post found in /r/finance and /r/austrian_economics.
NOTICE: This thread is for discussing the submission topic. Please do not discuss the concept of the autotldr bot here.
I made a list already a while ago, recently got back into the game, figures Zachlumia got nerfed. The old code still works, so without further ado here's the new list, highlights:
4 counties with 7 baronies:
c_gurganj c_khotan c_madurai c_nasaiya
72 counties with 6 baronies:
c_al_aqabah c_altay c_atbasar c_baghdad c_bampur c_beshbalik c_bihar c_brysis c_chaghaniyan c_charsianon c_cilicia c_damot c_dorostorum c_doudleby c_duklja c_east-tokharestan c_feher c_ferghana c_galatia c_garabogazkol c_gharb c_ghat c_giurgiu c_gurma c_guzgan c_hail c_hont c_ifni c_ile_de_france c_ionia c_kairwan c_kakheti c_karabalgasun c_karakorum c_kashgar c_kataka c_khabur c_khachen c_kiev c_kirman c_kishsh c_krakowska c_lycia c_lydia c_mangyshlak c_maragha c_merv c_mosul c_mugan c_navasarika c_novgorod c_oshrusana c_pagan c_penugonda c_phrygia c_plzen c_podrinje c_praha c_roma c_sarykamysh c_semey c_sharaf c_skopje c_szatmar c_tabriz c_tadla c_trigarta c_turan c_west_riding c_worodugu c_yatenga c_yazd
245 counties with 5 baronies:
[snip]
656 counties with 4 baronies:
[snip]
1108 counties with 3 baronies:
[snip]
459 counties with 2 baronies:
[snip]
16 counties with 1 baronies:
c_al-asa c_bornholm c_byzantion c_faereyar c_farafra c_isle_of_wight c_iviza c_madeira c_malta c_menorca c_orkney c_shetland c_tobruk c_uwal c_venezia c_yabrin
I've always seen "learn music theory", and I think I know the basics like scales, the different types of chords (or at least the popular ones), how to harmonize a melody, etc. But other than that, I haven't found out how music theory can help me make better melodies, since most of the time I only use my ear and not the theory.
My logic goes like this: the further you move along the axis of excludability from private goods towards common goods (and further towards common pool resources), the more inelastic supply of these goods tends to become. This continues until we reach economic land, the supply of which is perfectly inelastic.
Conversely, I've noticed that as private goods become less and less rivalrous, their supply likewise tends to become more and more elastic as marginal cost decreases. Are these correlations between excludability, rivalrousness, and supply elasticity valid, or am I completely out of my field of competence?
My conjecture appears to be consistent with all of the economic theory I know, but I have not been able to find any literature whatsoever online that talks about any such correlation. Does it exist or am I somehow completely wrong?
If there is any merit to my conjecture, would it furthermore be valid to say that a monopolistic good has perfectly elastic supply, where the price is set by the monopoly? I know that we normally say that monopolies don't have supply curves, but since monopolies are characterised by lack of rivalry (and are hence correlated with club goods) could this not be a valid characterisation?
