Edit-
> Just to make sure we don't forget the role of Indian "elites" (the habitat center set), here's more
https://swarajyamag.com/politics/genocide-refugees-and-faiz-how-media-covered-the-1971-crisis-from-the-pages-of-the-illustrated-weekly
Contributed by /u/papeeta_aadmi
Ye sare shuru se hi apna alag raag sunate hain and some of the op eds from that time of Muslim media seem so evil now in retrospect
But let us retrospect to understand how common Muslims are influenced by the influencers of their community
I am only posting the excerpts of Muslim news papers and op eds based in India -
http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00litlinks/naim/ambiguities/14muslimpress.html
Phase One (Prior to 23 March 1971) - When it was hoped that some kind of solution can be reached without India's intervention -
> The following quotation from Radiance (Delhi; 14 March 1971) nicely conveys the general reasoning. "The people of East Pakistan," the editorial said, "have risen as one man in support of Sheikh Mujib. The only force which stands in the way of a totally Marxist and independent East Bengal is Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. As such he deserves to be welcomed with open arms by the Western wing, notwithstanding his six points and four conditions."
Phase Two (23 March - 3 December 1971) - preparation of war, India's help to Mukti Bahini
> In pursuance of such feelings they urged upon the government of India a policy of "wait and see." On 4 April 1971, Radiance wrote with approval of India's "balanced policy," and urged continued discretion. An editorial in the **Jamiat Times (9 April 1971) was, however, a bit more critical, even somewhat cynical. It equated the issue of Bangladesh with that of Kashmir,**twitted the government of India for showing concern for the Muslims of East Bengal but neglecting the Muslims of India, and suggested that the government of India should either act in this instance the same way it did vis-a-vis communal riots in India, i.e. do nothing, or else it should recognise the Bangladesh Government in Exile and "turn Pakistani lies into truth."
> Some other suggestions, made in the initial stages as well as later in the year, were: (i) the government of India should actively discourage the East Bengalis lest their example come to be imitated by the dissidents in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu; (ii) the government of India should hold direct talks with Yahya Khan on all issues in order to settle them bilate
... keep reading on reddit ➡Salaam Alaikum,
So I live in Europe and saw the hadith where the Prophet (PUBH) said that the people who settles with the mushrikoon have nothing to do with him. There is also a verse in the quran that says that the world is big enough to live somewhere else instead with disbelievers.
Im born here and have been living here my whole life and really dont know what to do.
I see alot of reasons to actually move to a muslim country ( bad influence here for the children, familly and stuff for the future InshAllah) but idk what to do maybe someone can give advise InshAllah.
May Allah bless us
In positive way many SEA country like mine can product these kind of food and exporting it to muslim majority country for money. But in negative way you just support the stupid rituals of religion that make normal standard clean food to be normal standard clean food that Allah has certifications that it was truly clean.
Here are some links with details:
What is Article 35A?
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/what-is-article-35a/articleshow/68148587.cms
Centre all set to abrogate Article 35A in J&K, will move 10k additional paramilitary troops there: Sources
Tension grips Kashmir over possible scrapping of Article 35A
As more troops arrive, parties in Valley warn: Don’t touch Article 35A
Okay, so it seems imminent now, sooner or later Indian Muslims will be declared second class citizen, if not told to leave the country. I should start exploring my chances now. I’m thinking of somehow getting PR in some English speaking country, how and where should I start? Please help.
Edit: I am 23 years old. Did my graduation in 2017. I’m not paranoid or something. Even if I try to convince myself that everything will be fine, I don’t think I’ll ever be comfortable enough to marry and raise kids in this country.
In another meeting of the grand Council the pink elephant in the room has been addressed, that is what should be the role of non-Muslims and non-turks in the ottoman empire from here on out. Some seek to give The non-Turks of the empire equal rights,and some are even pushing for local autonomy to be given to groups such as the Armenians Bulgarians and Kurds, though this is fiercely contested by those who stand to lose their positions of power. Much of the assembly however seems to agree that steps should be taken to ensure that the multi ethnic empire doesn’t start tearing at the seams. “ you can’t have a State that doesn’t let most of its people hold government positions or tax them just because they practice a different religion,that’s just not a recipe for stability.”-local Armenian man interviewed. An even more controversial subject being tackled is the role of non-Muslims. On Muslims in the empire are not allowed to own weapons and have to pay a special tax in order to practice their religion. This leads to much internal as well as international strife as nations such as Russia seek to undermine the ottoman empire on the grounds that they prosecute their orthodox Christian minority.However several governors virtually all of the clergy are opposed to granting equal rights to the non-Muslims across the empire. “I cannot think of a greater hypocrisy than to say that we prosecute our religious minorities” said by a Albanian scholar.”When the Jews were being persecuted and killed in Europe we took them in.rather than killing all the Christians in the land we conquered,we allowed them to lIve in peace. How many in Europe can say that about muslims? Russia is constantly rattling it’s saber do to our treatment of orthodox Christians but I ask you how do they treat their Muslims?its The exact same yet it seems to only be a problem when we do it.” Many religious figures have raised similar arguments and are saying that if the proposed real Shower quality laws were to pass then I would only be a matter of time before the Islamic nature of the Middle East would be threatened.the The sultan in all of this seemed willing to support The ethic and religious minorities, though he seems to be careful in choosing his words on how far he would support them.
Yazid I used Christian soldiers and married Christian women. Was his political aim to keep the peace with a large non-Muslim and non-Arab population? What can even be said of his personal faith?
Thinking about it, Abd al-Malik who became Caliph shortly after him famously was the first one to put "No got but God and Muhammad is his prophet" on coins. Could this be viewed to intentionally put distance between himself and Yazid? Or as a formal declaration that the Caliphate was an Islamic polity not a cosmopolitan or secular one?
