A list of puns related to "Gateway to Gateway Protocol"
Hey all, I've just posted an article on Orion Protocol here:
https://www.mangoresearch.co/orionprotocol-gateway-to-everything-crypto/
I wrote this article explaining the majority of the Orion Protocol and tried to make it as simple and easy to understand as possible.
Let me know what you thought about it :)
The Cook Protocol is a platform built on Ethereum blockchain that connects retail investors with professional fund managers. The Cook Protocol provides retail investors with a diverse selection of asset management options offered by a wide variety of professional asset managers, so investors do not need to understand sophisticated concepts to ride the DeFi train. They just need to choose their preferred strategies. Risk-averse investors can choose more passive index-based investing, while high-return-seeking investors can opt for more actively managed investments.
https://cook-protocol.medium.com/cook-protocol-your-gateway-to-defi-4f2c7d826ed4
#COOK #CookProtocol #Secure #Transparent #Blockchain #Cryptocurrency
I have a pretty rare set of temperature sensors that Iβve reverse engineered the signal protocol for. Is there a gateway software I can install on my Arduino to get this data to Home Assistant? I have a 433 MHz receiver hooked up to the Arduino.
I looked at Open MQTT Gateway, but it doesnβt seem to support adding your own protocols. I donβt know much about RFLink it any other ones either.
I have 2 MicroEpsilon OptoControl 2520 laser micrometers Manufactures Page used to measure multiple wire diameters from perpendicular perspectives. Using an A-B compactlogix or controllogix PLC required us to brew up our own communication driver using MSG instructions, which is functional, but somewhat cringeworthy. The micrometers in question support EtherCAT natively, and I have heard of some protocol gateways out there that can translate EtherCAT into Ethernet/IP. A google search revealed to me that there are EtherCAT masters and slaves! I'm no expert in EtherCAT, so not sure what to make of this information.
I'm imagining a "box" that I can "map" data from one protocol into another, and with that knowledge, I can then set up a generic Ethernet device in the Logix Designer application and document all the tags.
Does anyone have experience in this field? Used anything for this same issue? Warnings, recommendations? I'm fishing for anything at this point. Thanks!
| FORMS SOCIAL-298272281-12:
Mykeyboard.eu Discord (#ic-gmk-gateway) to discuss
-----------
| FORMS BASEKIT-739520667-18:
| [FILE LOADING...
| [EXTRACT --B--
| [INSERT --F5--
| [INSERT --F6--
| [RUN CLEANUP R4
| [ --> PRESENT
-----------
| FORMS NOVELTIES-384016495-27:
| [FILE LOADING...
| [RUN COMMAND GMK SPECIFICATIONS
| [INSERT --1.5u--
| [INSERT --1.5u--
| [RUN CLEANUP R3
| [RUN CLEANUP R4
| [SYMMETRICALITY ACHIEVED
| [--> PRESENT
-----------
| FORMS SPACEBARS-737395769-95:
| [ --> PRESENT
-----------------------------------------------
Chapter 1.65 by Rooke Design
RAMA U80A by RAMA WORKS
Polaris by ai03 and kevinplus
(More Renders of Chapter 1.65 in GH IC Thread)
-----------
-----------
-----------
Additional Information about the Keyset and Interest Check:
-----------
Deskmat Specifications:
A standard 3 tier campus network will mostly comprise of layer 3 switches at the core, right? Is it common to see more than an edge router in a medium to large business? Does a layer3 switch have dynamic routing protocols? Will OSPF and EIGRP become a thing of the past?
I have a project I am working on for a brewery here are the details:
The project is automating the carbonation of the beer after it has gone through a centrifuge.
I am building the carbonator and the centrifuge is already there and currently in use.
I need my controls (Siemens ET200SP) to get data from the centrifuge (AB CompactLogix), so I got a protocol converter to make things easy.
My plan is to set the up converter to get the data from the centrifuge and then run a modbus slave that carbonator can read.
My friend then looks over my project and asks why I don't just the protocol converters gateway blocks to write to my data blocks in the carbonator. He says then I won't have to have all this modbus code which can be a pain to set up in TIA Portal, and it's just way easier.
I feel like using the modbus read gives me a better way to start my fallback controls if the comms go down. Although I could just set up a heartbeat using the converters internal time clock.
So I am wondering if anyone out there has an opinion on which way is better?
We are using a serial network with Slave Node IDs greater than 254. Most of the protocol gateways I am finding online only support up to 254 addresses.
In my scenario, I need to share a single serial connection with a local Ethernet network and the serial radio network for polling the device remotely. A protocol gateway will do this however I have run into installations where I need to configure my Slave Node ID to a number higher than 254 and the utility for the gateway will not let me enter a number greater than 254.
Any ideas on how to get around this issue?
Thanks in advance!
Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.