https://preview.redd.it/efj5lrmdnvn61.jpg?width=564&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=aef217f3bd0b8c59798e9ca8c277f1bb6dff65d0
The theatrical poster for the film Mac and Me features the connection of humanity and aliens to the moon, like that in the film E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial and Transformers to name just a few.
https://reddit.com/link/m85hp4/video/58i7sr5gnvn61/player
In this opening scene for the film, we see the aliens get taken off their home world by a human spacecraft where they will be taken to Earth. Saturn looms unrealistically in the background, emphasizing the universal secret that Saturn and the aliens are linked.
https://reddit.com/link/m85hp4/video/bye0awdhnvn61/player
In this scene, the aliens make a peculiar gesture with their hands to connect with Saturn as their supernatural home world. The symbol they are making representing the Bull's Horns/Crescent.
The alien on the right does it with the sun framed behind it, making the Star and Crescent as a universal Saturnian symbol representing the Divine Source of the Primeval Cube and God's Realm.
In the next scene, we see an alien getting chased by a pack of dogs. The dogs represent Sirius, as the constellation Canis Major as the Dog, and the alien represents Orion as constellation biblically connected as a motif of God's power in the form of the manifested Messiah. The Three Stars of the Belt of Orion symbolize the Trinity, and God taunts the wicked in the Book of Job, "Who can loosen the Belt of Orion?"
The star Sirius as the Dog represents the Mithraic Antichrist as revealed in my other posts, and the Satanic cabal willingly stands with the motif of the dog to oppose God as the dog has a negative connotation in the Scripture.
"Outside (the Cube) are the dogs," and "the scraps are for the dogs" etc.
In the Bible that physical violence toward dogs was considered acceptable (1 Samuel 17:43; Proverbs 26:17).
To compare a human to a dog or to call them a dog was to imply that they were of very low status (2 Kings 8:13; Exodus 22:31; Deuteronomy 23:18; 2 Samuel 3:8; Proverbs 26:11; Ecclesiastes 9:4; 2 Samuel 9:8; 1 Samuel 24:14).
In the New Testament, calling a human a dog meant that the person was considered evil (Philemon 3:2; Revelation 22:15).
In these days, dogs have become very popular and are considered "man's best friend" and most films put dogs to good use as a protagonist's trusty side kick. This is Antichrist and fully normalized.
https://reddit.com/link/m85hp4/vide
... keep reading on reddit ➡So which is it? Or does god have a separate man and woman version which he can transform into.
If you believe that Jesus Christ is god in the flesh and you believe that god's physical form is Jesus Christ, this question is not for you. But here's a question for you: if god's image is Jesus Christ and has always been (if that's what you believe in), and god made man and woman in his image where does he keep the woman image or where did the woman form come from since Jesus is believed to be fully a man?
This is a serious and genuine post that came to me through divine intervention while I was bloody mess drowning in the sorrows of pain. No, I'm not joking and I want to know what y'all think.
He said to the woman, "Is there anything on you that you'd like to change?" She said, "Yes. Could you get rid of this middle breast?"
God snapped his fingers and it was done.
She exclaimed, holding the third breast in her hand,
"What am I going to do with this useless tit?"
And God created man!!
Why did God impregnate a virgin woman without giving her a choice? Didn’t she have free will? Why did he send a messenger to tell her instead of owning what he did and telling her himself? And why did he have to have a woman to procreate if he had been able to create Adam without impregnating anybody? And if he could take his son to heaven in flesh and bone why not just bring him to earth in flesh and bone too?
I know this may seem like a simple question, it if u really think about it, it’s not that simple. Why did he decide to create a man first before a woman? What if God actually made the woman first and males that transcribed the Bible just wanted the man to be made first to excuse their actions and thoughts towards women? This was a journal prompt that I can’t really answer myself. Think of this as a science experimental question or a thought exercise. You don’t have to answer, I just wanted to put this out there. ☺️
Ted is trying to get Mrs. Doyle to go into the kitchen to stop her feckin’ swearing. She’s on his right as he goes towards the kitchen door. Dermot Morgan either forgets that the door opens in both directions or Pauline McLynn was supposed to be on his left as, when he tries to pull the door, she is in the way. Watched this a jillion times and never noticed it.
And God Created Woman…(1956): *CONTAINS SPOILERS* The title alone is suggestive of how co-writer, director, and Brigitte Bardot’s ex-husband Roger Vadim viewed women – as seductive, untrustworthy, beguiling, and the destroyers of men. ‘And God Created Woman…’ is a sexist, racist, boring, antiquated, horribly acted and written French melodrama that became the ‘Basic Instinct’ of 1956 by introducing adolescent boys to Brigitte Bardot.
In ‘And God Created Woman…’, Brigitte Bardot plays an 18-year old orphan named Juliette. She lives in Saint Tropez, France with her adopted, strict parents. Juliette loves music, dancing, and men. And men love her back. Three in fact. The first is the much older and wealthier Eric Carradine (Curt Jurgens, who was famous for playing the James Bond villain in The Spy Who Loved Me). The second is Antoine (Christian Marquand), the oldest of three brothers who own a plot of beachfront property that Carradine is keen on buying to build his casino on. The third is Michel (Jean-Louis Trintignant), who is Antoine’s naïve, younger brother. However, due to her wild, sexual antics, Juliette’s parents decide to send her back to the orphanage. To prevent her from having to go back to the orphanage (and because he is madly in love with her), Michel offers to marry Juliette, who reluctantly accepts (because she really loves Michel’s older brother).
If you think the plot of this movie is completely dumb and simply set up to have Bardot appear in numerous sexual situations (without any nudity because it was 1956 after all), you are correct. But the filmmakers do not appear to mind this and, in fact, shamelessly embrace the shallowness of their movie. Which begs the question of why this film remains noteworthy (and why it was selected by the Criterion Collection) so many years after its release. The 1950’s began to witness a kind of sexual reawakening with the teenage generation that clashed with post-war masculine conservatism. You saw this with the pop culture phenomenon of Elvis Presley, James Dean, and Brigette Bardot. In this film, Bardot’s character does not concern herself with what others will think of her freewheeling sexual escapades and in-the-moment attitude toward life. In one sense, Juliette represents women’s sexual liberation from the expectations of men – Juliette pursues and spurns whoever and whenever she pleases and she clearly shows all the men in this film that she doesn’t belong to anyone. However, in another sen
... keep reading on reddit ➡
There's really two possibilities:
-
I always existed
-
I came into existence
If I always existed, I'm having similarities to God. That's a view most religions refute.
If I was "created," I was created without my consent and out into this shit world. Weather it's to test me, cleanse me, purify me or whatever. I never asked for this. And in essence, whatever happens is god's fault. That means if I have a rough life or go to hell. I never asked to be. In fact if there's a button to press that would send me directly back into the void, I'd totally press it. Suicide is not that button, here's why:
-
We have an inmate desire to live, even if our lives are shit. It's against our very program to self eradicate. In other words, it's not an option. It's as much an option as someone putting a gun in your head and asking you to do things. You're free not to, yet the consequence is severe. Do you really have an option in any of these? No, you don't. It's coercion.
-
The mystery of what's after death. If there were an afterlife, you may be punished for suicide. In other words, suicide is not that magical button to send you back into the void. It's not 100% guaranteed that death is final.
So, me, you and everyone else are brought into this existence without consent to suffer and possibly suffer indefinitely after you die (if there's hell). If you could ask that person in hell, would you like to have never been created? I'd think the answer is yes. It is for me. n = 1.
So, my point is God at it's core is responsible for all human suffering and suffering in hereafter (if there is one). The geniuses will argue he's also responsible for the blessing here and after death. My answer to that is the suffering doesn't outweigh the reward. If person A is suffered in this life and next, does that make it worthwhile that person B lived a great life and is now in heaven? What about the desires and wishes of person A? Maybe you're person B, I feel I'm person A.
I resent God, I resent creation and I do not believe any of it is any good.
Edit:
Plz read over the comments before making a post. Much of what you're about to say have been answered.
IMDB Link: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0049189/
This is the film that made Brigitte Bardot a star and despite what you think of her as a person, it's undeniable how culturally important she was to cinema. I always considered her to be right next to Marilyn Monroe in terms of popular sex symbols.
The plot can be melodramatic at times, but the beautiful cinematography and wonderful performance from Bardot save this film. First, I'll talk about the cinematography, it's fantastic. You may have heard the phrase "every frame a painting", and this film is definitely the epitome of that saying. It looks absolutely beautiful, and the Eastmancolor makes the colors really pop (but I wonder what it would've looked like in Technicolor).
Now, I want to talk about how fantastic Bardot is here. Obviously, she's beautiful, but her performance is so fitting for this character. I think a lot of people associate these sex symbols with just their looks, but a lot of the time they're so talented.
I definitely have to rewatch Barbarella now, as in my review for the film, I don't think I really got it. Now, seeing another film directed by Roger Vadim, that movie will probably make more sense now.
Overall, this is a simple, decent film that's elevated by wonderful performances and cinematography. It isn't anything too special, and I think Bardot would go onto star in better films (such as Le Mépris). This was still a good time, but I don't see myself ever rewatching it.
Rating: 5.5/10
First off it’s so old the Bible saying that god created Adam and Eve like people in ancient times had no explanation for anything they weren’t smart and they couldn’t explain why we existed so they invented god and said that “he” created us also why is god always depicted as a man also if god created humans what created god, humans created god lmfao.
I was having dinner at my so’s grandparents and his father was there and I was talking to my so’s father about how old the earth is and the Big Bang theory (not the show) and the grandfather buds in and says god created earth and us and I was stunned cause i only ever heard that when I was being taken to church as a child and they’d always tell kids that god created us and so we should cherish him it’s bullshit anyways I was being nice and I said I have a more scientific view of the creation of earth I’m not religious but I’ll listen to peoples beliefs and respect them, and then he says reallyyy like in a condescending tone, I feel like people who still believe that god created us is just im not sure how to put it but like evolution has been proven we evolved from like Neanderthals and we figured out we could make mouth noises and communicate and I have my own views on how the earth was created through cosmic collisions or whatever the Big Bang but I just find it so hard to believe people still believe that ooo god created us bullcrap.
So which is it? Or did god have a separate man and woman version which he can transform into.
If you believed god = Jesus Christ in the flesh then the question may not be for you. But here's a question for you: if god's image was Jesus Christ and had always been (if that's what you believed in), and god made man and woman in his image where did he keep the woman image or where did the woman form come from since Jesus is believed to be fully a man?
This is a serious and genuine post that came to me through divine intervention while I was bloody mess drowning in the sorrows of pain. No, I'm half joking but still curious what y'all think and I never really dared to ask these questions before.
)