Support for parent application https://www.iaccess.gov.on.ca/ParentAppWeb/parentapp/index.xhtml
Out of all the websites I've ever seen that claim to be valid XHTML, I think I have yet to see one that actually is. I'm pretty sure it's worse to claim to be something you're not, instead of never claiming anything to begin with so why do these web designers do it? What's the point? Raising awareness? But how can you even do that when your own work is not valid?
I know getting your site to be valid is really not all that useful and is more about nerdy bragging rights than anything else, but when I see these "valid XHTML" tags on websites I don't know whether to laugh at the designer's ignorance of his own work or pity him for blatantly lying.
Where do you guys stand on this? For me and my own website, I don't rest until the W3 validator says there are zero errors and zero warnings. It's just a matter of principle.
Is there a good reason to use XHTML 1.0 Transitional or some older form of HTML versus using the current standard HTML5?
I ask because I was working on a startup and coded about 70% of the website but was unable to work further do to other commitments. So I passed off my code and moved along. I checked back on the project the other day and they had scrapped my code and started fresh ( because the new developer who came on board right as I left envisioned to do things differently and wasn't familiar with the php framework I built it upon). Anyways, I looked into the source via Firebug as saw they were using XHTML 1.0 Transitional and not HTML5? Is there a benefit I am missing...or is this odd to be building a new custom website not with HTML5?
I'm trying to embed a custom Google map into the webpage but it won't validate. (due to the iFrame tag supposedly)
I'm very new to web design and I don't really know what I'm doing so any help would be appreciated. This blog seems to have a solution but I don't really understand what they're doing.
Hello, we are creating a HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.1 textbook. It's completely free (creative commons). It's 90% done.
I need people to help proof read it for grammar, spelling, proper syntax and everything else because I'm going to create a full interactive course to supplement this text. The course would be something similar to a college course (lectures, projects, quizzes, exams etc.) but self-paced and completely free. I also have a bunch of other technologies that I've created to make it easy and fun to learn.
Okay, now to the details of this textbook: Its HTML 4.01/XHTML 1.1 only. Don't teach CSS/HTML 5 etc. Those will have their own separate course. For a beginner, it can get pretty confusing if you are lumping a bunch of separate languages together. This course will teach you HTML 4.01/XHTML 1.1 completely and then you can move on to the HTML5/CSS3 course and learn those languages pretty easily. Also, don't cover obsolete/deprecated tags. Obviously the correct functionality for those tags will be covered in the HTML5/CSS3 courses. Keep the explanations simply as HTML being a structural language.
The PDF version of the book can be obtained at: HTML 4.01 & XHTML 1.1 Textbook
To edit the book, please visit the wiki at: HTML 4.01 & XHTML 1.1 wiki
Thanks everybody! =)
So i went into my email, and notices 2 emails recieved from Russian people (Written in Russian)
The emails have rnadom English letters in all caps in the email subject and email body, and a xhtml files attached to them.
Gmail did not flag them as spam mail, and I saw them at my main inbox.
I'm adding print screens of them, really curious whats this is all about
Thanks in advance!
https://preview.redd.it/kcannkipnnu71.png?width=1530&format=png&auto=webp&s=4cfea824b1b3e0a2ba923610bd8887e95341e7b8
Yesterday, when I was about to go to bed, I got a weird email with an attached xhtml file.
When I tried opening it, it didn't redirect me anywhere so I decided to open it using VSCode to look inside. This is the code that is in this file:
I'm a web developer myself so what immediately caught my attention was this atob() function with a long string in it. I haven't seen this function before, nor heard about it, so I looked it up. It turns out it's a base-64 decoder https://www.w3schools.com/jsref/met_win_atob.asp . So I decoded this string and got this link: http://domen0001.pro/6TS7Z7bC?557648tjvwuzqe (It's safe to visit). It got me to a "Bitcoin Cloud Mining Farm" . It said that my account was locked and asked me to enter a new 6 number pin. Those 6 numbers are in this same link. After I entered the pin-code it shows me that I have accumulated over >0.7BTC waiting to be transferred to me. ( I don't recall ever signing up for this). It asked my BTC address, so knowing it's actually safe to post your crypto wallet address anywhere, I pasted in my BTC address from Binance.
Finally, this is where it gets very suspicious. They ask me to transfer a "miners fee" of minimum 0.00193BTC to them so they can release "my" 0.7BTC transaction to me:
https://preview.redd.it/3msliu3tf6v71.png?width=1211&format=png&auto=webp&s=d7ae21b88821ae5754c2f11785dc4c2597888036
So, I checked their BTC address first: 3FmyVL9rwhWhCejWnB1jn3sYk4ZRP5D24m
Strangely, in Bitcoin Abuse Database checking this address didn't show anything bad? https://www.bitcoinabuse.com/reports/3FmyVL9rwhWhCejWnB1jn3sYk4ZRP5D24m I don't think I'll transfer that miners fee.
What do you guys think? It definitely looks like a sophisticated scam to me. Since, no matter what link I press on this site, it doesn't work.
Dear Redditers and Code crackers!
Recently I've been receiving a couple of seemingly dangerous emails which somehow dodged Google's spam filter. I checked the original email which actually showed the text inside the html file and it had some Base64 code in it, which led to a website. (Probably virus stuff, so no touchy risked...)
Anyways the email had some text in the body that looked like it could actually be a hidden message. They looked like words with different length and and had space between them so it seemed like a coded sentence. At first I did not care about it but when I started to receive more and more it really started bugging me. I will share the texts inside of it, and some pictures. Obviously I will not paste the attachment or the link.
Do you think it actually means something, or it's just randomly generated text to trick Google?
Thanks for your answers! Have a nice day~! (V sbyybjrq gur ehyrf ... >!V ubcr!<)
BODY TEXTS:
- 1st: 4Q 70023 RWUT6D 87102 TCYZ2D 56453 WJBL0A 843 YNOJ5A 1610 TPBR3A 3367 WFUX5V 82083 NHHC0W 833 BGGD6R 514 HUOK3O 43507 ZWUA
- 2nd: 7W 4587 KZKH7N 706 SGBL6O 23628 FXFA5P 636 JPUN2J 77007 TZEX7L 37452 HXBD4B 4774 GFQN
- 3rd: EWNUBQ FTOPAZ CDYR XBV UEKFN FDYE YNBXG ABFAG PYK UIR IUXCZ BEOG CCOEEI HPK BVYTCF
- 4th: WRR QHDQ GZSVZLO PLAIJYK NWCNY
- 5th: XVY YGD (this one is the latest one and had nothing in the body, only the title. This is the only one having xhtml attachment, so I would not be able to see what is in the attachment without downloading it and opening it... would not risk it)
IM LIVID
Pittsburgh Steelers at Kansas City Chiefs
- GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium
- Kansas City, Missouri
| First | Second | Third | Fourth | Final | |
| Chiefs | 0 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 42 |
| Steelers | 0 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 21 |
- General information
| Coverage | Odds |
| NBC, Telemundo, Peacock | Kansas City -12.0 O/U 46.5 |
| Weather |
| 32ยฐF/Wind 9mph/Clear sky/No precipitation expected |
- Thread Notes
- Message The Moderators
| Discuss whatever you wish. You can trash talk, but keep it civil. |
| If you are experiencing problems with comment sorting in the official reddit app, we suggest using a third-party client instead (Android, iOS) |
| Turning comment sort to 'new' will help you see the newest comments. |
| Try Tab Auto Refresh to auto-refresh this tab. |
| Use reddit-stream.com to get an autorefreshing version of this page |
| Check in on the r/nfl chat: ##rnfl on Libera (open in browser). |
| Show your team affiliation - pick your team's logo in the sidebar. |
Because of inflation
| C/ATT (%) | YDs (/PA) | TD-INT | RTG (QBR) | C/ATT (%) | YDs (/PA) | TD-INT | RTG (QBR) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Garoppolo | 16/25 (64.00) | 172 (6.9) | 0-1 | 67.4 | 23/43 (53.49) | 254 (5.9) | 1-1 | 69.3 | D. Prescott | |
| 1/1 (100.00) | 16 (16.0) | 0-0 | 118.8 | B. Anger | ||||||
| CAR | YDs (/PA) | TD | LONG | CAR | YDs (/PA) | TD | LONG | |||
| E. Mitchell | 27 | 96 (3.6) | 1 | 16 | 12 | 31 (2.6) | 0 | 9 | E. Elliott | |
| D. Samuel | 10 | 72 (7.2) | 1 | 26 | 4 | 27 (6.8) | 1 | 17 | D. Prescott | |
| J. Garoppolo | 1 | 1 (1.0) | 0 | 1 | 4 | 14 (3.5) | 0 | 8 | T. Pollard | |
| REC/TGT | YDs | TDs | LONG | REC/TGT | YDs | TDs | LONG | |||
| B. Aiyuk | 5/6 | 66 | 0 | 37 | 7/8 | 89 | 0 | 38 | D. Schultz | |
| D. Samuel | 3/3 | 38 | 0 | 19 | 6/10 | 64 | 1 | 20 | A. Cooper | |
| J. Jennings | 3/5 | 29 | 0 | 13 | 5/10 | 62 | 0 | 24 | C. Wilson | |
| G. Kittle | 1/3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | 1/5 | 21 | 0 | 11 | C. Lamb | |
| TOT | SOLO | SKs (Hits) | PA DEF | TOT | SOLO | SKs (Hits) | PA DEF | |||
| E. Moseley | 12 | 10 | 0 (0) | 0 | 13 | 5 | 0 (0) | 0 | L. Vander | |
| D. Greenlaw | 5 | 3 | 0 (0) | 0 | 10 | 3 | 0 (0) | 0 | M. Parsons | |
| A. Al-Shaair | 5 | 3 | 0 (1) | 0 | 8 | 3 | 0 (0) | 0 | D. Kazee | |
| F. Warner | 5 | 2 | 0 (0) | 0 | 7 | 3 | 0 (0) | 1 | J. Kearse | |
| A. Armstead | 4 | 1 | 1 (3) | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 (0) | 0 | D. Wilson |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | 10 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 23 |
| DAL | 0 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 17 |
On a pH scale because sheโs basic as hell.
Today I found out my raise was only 1.75%. After not getting a raise for the last 2 years I was promised that I would be getting 15% raise, but it was verbally so I have no record of it. I tried talking to my boss about it, but he kept blowing me off. So after he left for lunch today I left my keys on his desk, clocked out and went to lunch. I texted him that I quit effective right now. I was doing the work of 3 people, it was not worth the stress for $49K a year. I know it will hurt them pretty badly to lose me, and I do not have another job lined up right now, but I will start looking tomorrow.
###5th Test, The Ashes at Hobart
Cricinfo | Reddit-Stream | ๐ฅ ๐ฅ ๐ฅ ๐ฅ ๐ฅ
| Innings | Score |
|---|---|
| Australia | 241/6 (Ov 59.3) |
| Batter | Runs | Balls | SR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Carey* | 10 | 27 | 37.04 |
| Mitchell Starc | 0 | 5 | 0.0 |
| Bowler | Overs | Runs | Wickets |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Wood | 11.3 | 79 | 1 |
| Stuart Broad | 18 | 48 | 2 |
Recent : . . . 4 . | . 1 . . . W | 1 . . . . . | 4 . .
Day 1 - England chose to field.
^(Live match threads:) ^(India vs South Africa, Day 4) ^|
[^(Send feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=poochi&subject=Bot Feedback) ^| ^(Schedule) ^| ^(Stat Help)
^(Please don't post illegal streaming links in match threads)
