Once the telescope is fully deployed, calibrated and in position at L2 do scientist have something they've prioritized to observe?
I would imagine there is quite a queue of observations scientists want to make. How do they decide which one is the first and does it have a reason for being first?
Quote: Frank Vogel just indicated that, with LA’s success over the past month with center-less lineups, the Lakers will likely use Anthony Davis and LeBron James as their two primary centers once AD returns.
Tweet: https://twitter.com/jovanbuha/status/1477165546055426050
Initial link got deleted so i post it again.
LeBron at center has a strong offensive rating but with ADs injury history idk if that’s a good long term strategy long term
>Steve Nash at shootaround had no updates on the playing status of Kyrie Irving, Nic Claxton and James Harden. That will be determined closer to tip-off. All practiced fully. How did they look? “Handsome,” Nash said.
>Steve Nash said Joe Harris’ rehab has been trickier than the Nets were expecting.
Harden has already scored 40 points or higher against every single team in the NBA except of the Rockets, his career high against the Rockets is only 29 points. With KD being rested he will have a good chance to break the record tonight.
Other players that came close to break the records were Kobe and MJ, Kobe has scored 40 points against every team he played against but obviously never had the chance to do it against the Lakers. MJ has done it against every team except the Bulls and Raptors i believe.
Thanks for all your great recipe comments! We're done replying now. Catch you all in the new year!
Congress created a Permanent UAP Research Office and have updated the definition of what they consider to be a UAP.
>At the same time, the amendment significantly broadens the definition of UFOs to include “transmedium” craft, which the legislation defines as “objects or devices that are observed to transition between space and the atmosphere, or between the atmosphere and bodies of water.”
Senator Gillibrand tweeted this week:
>If we want to defend our airspace and maintain our strategic edge, we need to investigate Unidentified Aerial Phenomena and determine if they belong to a foreign entity or something else altogether. It's a national security issue — and we can't bury our heads in the sand.
Bill Nelson this week:
>Another subject that has gone increasingly mainstream in Washington is unidentified flying objects. In June a report found that although intelligence officials do not believe aliens are responsible for dozens of accounts of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), they cannot fully explain what is.
>
>Nelson comments: “You’ve seen those films now made public. They [navy pilots] know they saw something. What is it? I don’t know. Is it an adversary on Earth that has that kind of technology? I hope not.
>
>“Do I think that there is life in the universe? The answer to that is clearly I do and we are searching for it. How can I limit a universe that is so big that I cannot see how big it is, where we are in a galaxy with billions if not trillions of stars and there are additional billions if not trillions of galaxies, and the universe is expanding?”
>
>He adds with a chuckle: “Like people that tried to limit Copernicus and Galileo that the Earth didn’t revolve about the sun, that everything revolved around the Earth. So, you get the drift.”
>
>What first contact with an alien civilisation would mean for humanity has long been the stuff of science fiction. But politicians ta
