University Of Windsor Faculty Of Law Puns

Moving away from rhetoric and hyperbole, a multidisciplinary team of Bentley University faculty provides straightforward answers to your questions about the first months of the Biden Administration’s policies, proposals, and legislative agenda. We welcome questions on trade policy, human rights, social policies, environmental policy, economic policy, immigration, foreign policy, the strength of the American democracy, judicial matters, and the role of media in our current reality. Send your questions here from 5-7pm EDT or beforehand to ama@bentley.edu

Here is our proof https://twitter.com/bentleyu/status/1378071257632145409?s=20

Thank you for joining us: We’re wrapping up. If you have any further questions please send them by email to ama@bentley.edu.

BentleyFacultyAMA

Hello,

I intend to apply for the Faculty of Law in Tohoku University this year. I have N1 in Japanese, and have scored 301 for EJU the previous year. As information of the actual EJU score required to enter Japanese universities seems pretty limited, may I know what is the actual minimum score required to enter Tohoku University, Faculty of Law? Thank you.

I am aiming to score: Japanese: 350+ (excluding writing) Social Studies: 190 Mathematics: 150

For the upcoming June EJU exam. Would this score be sufficient for Tohoku University, Faculty of Law? Please advice, thank you. :)

RAMSEY CASE TURNS INTO PAPER WAR PARENTS, AUTHORITIES TAKE CASES PUBLIC AFTER INTERVIEW CANCELED

Rocky Mountain News (Denver, CO)

April 27, 1997

Charlie Brennan Rocky Mountain News Staff

JonBenet Ramsey's murder case finally ended up in court last week - the court of public opinion.

Four months after the 6-year-old was killed, Boulder authorities and the kindergartner's parents took their cases public amid an unprecedented flurry of faxes and memos and letters.

“These guys are shaking faxes at each other like warriors shaking spears,'' Denver defense attorney Craig Truman said. “And I don't believe we've seen the last of it.''

At issue was the standoff over an interview with John and Patsy Ramsey - a stalemate that began the day after their daughter was found dead in the basement of the family home Dec. 26.

In those 120-plus days, the Ramseys have been transformed in the public eye from grieving parents to primary suspects.

Observers suggest that the couple's concern about public perception - along with frustration with the Boulder police, whom they accuse of indiscriminate leaks - prompted the strategic shift.

Whatever the case, it left legal experts shaking their heads.

“I can certainly not recall an exchange of memoranda between defense counsel and a police department that is this acidic,'' Truman said.

• “This is pretty much a unique set of circumstances,'' said past president of the Colorado Criminal Defense Bar.

Little more than a week ago, Boulder District Attorney Alex Hunter said for the first time that the Ramseys are the focus of the investigation. He didn't call them prime suspects, but their own spokesman had done so long ago.

With that as background, the Ramseys' lawyers broke their silence after police canceled a long-sought interview, saying they could not abide by the Ramseys' terms.

Kaplan, an adjunct faculty member at the University of Denver College of Law, seemed amazed that the Ramseys' lawyers had held their tongues as long as they did.

“You've got defense lawyers who are at the top in their field, who have spent four months exhibiting their professionalism by not presenting their position through the media,'' Kaplan said. “And while they've waited for law enforcement and prosecutors to do a good job, their clients have been raked over the coals by slurs and innuendo.''

**The first statement the Ramseys' lawyers released last week expressed a lack of confidence in Boulder police but a willingness

Hey there :)

I am working and living in Luxembourg and my brother is planning to come to Luxembourg and apply to the factory of law of University of Luxembourg next year :)

But we lack a lot of information, about the overall process, e.g. what are the entrance exams, how good the language knowledge should be (we are not native speakers of English or French), how hard it is to learn in the university, especially for people who don't know French very well and are trying to learn, will the university accept people from non-EU other countries during this pandemic, what happens if you fail the exams, etc...

I really like Luxembourg and that's why I proposed thisoption to my brother :) can be very important for the university selection :)

I really like Luxembourg and that's why I proposed this option to my brother :)

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3751640

(free download at link)

https://preview.redd.it/h1aodxnlmr651.png?width=1800&format=png&auto=webp&s=df7eb9506375b200f6b6350fb38629fa885b9961

https://www.klif.com/news/65-faculty-members-from-ag-barrs-law-school-alma-mater-say-he-has-failed-to-fulfill-his-oath-of-office/

Source: https://www.facebook.com/cuspcusp/posts/2677719805622080?__tn__=K-R

Chinese version follows below

【There is More to Justice than its Shattered Visage】

Statement from current students and alumni of the Law Faculties of the Universities of Hong Kong in reply to the Hong Kong Bar Association’s statement dated 9.12.19.

We are students and graduates of the law faculties of a number of universities who have come together to mourn the loss of Hong Kong’s rule of law.

It has fallen, not at the hands of protestors, not by petrol bombs - but by the tyranny of our Government. It has always been known, that under the Basic Law, the power of final interpretation was a captive of the Central Government, and that has always been the case because Hong Kong has always been powerless in the strife between nations. But our Government has never attempted to defend what little independence it had within the framework. Far from that, it has invited the Central Government’s interference into our system at every turn: in 1999, on the pretext of completely duplicitous immigration estimates, it invited the Central Government to interpret the Basic Law, overthrowing the Court of Final Appeal’s judgment regarding whether children of Hong Kong citizens may enjoy the right of abode in Hong Kong. The precedent being set, a deluge of Executive interference was soon to follow. It became custom for the Executive and the Central Government to interfere, and for the courts of Hong Kong to oblige. From abandoning plans for true universal suffrage of the Legislative Council and the Chief Executive to disqualifying Legislative Council members under the transparent pretext of interpreting oath requirements under the Basic Law, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress has wielded its power of interpretation as its chosen legal weapon to bludgeon political opposition into non-existence. Stripped of its substance, the independence of Hong Kong’s Judiciary became a mythical creature, existing in name only.

What of prosecutorial independence? Under Article 63 of the Basic Law, prosecution affairs are said to be ‘free from interference’. But what the Department of Justice has chosen to do, with its complete control over prosecutions, is to pursue harsh punishment of a harmless old woman collecting cardboard on the streets; all the while indulging the bottomless greed of our senior officials.

O