Calculus 1 Class if that helps.

I have this on the right panel:

Summary for This Month Total Items Shipped: 0 Total Earnings: $0.00 Total Ordered Items: 1 Clicks 110 Conversion: 0.91%

So that's one order right? But no earnings on the graph?

Hi there! I use graphs frequently in my day to day work, but have found the available libraries underwhelming for a few reasons. To that end I started working on a graph library that is closer to what I think should be available. The work in progress is available here. There are a few features of this that I'd like to present:

• The indices of the graph are unconstrained (other than being ordered). Compare this to fgl and Data.Graph in containers where the indices are constrained to be integers. I find this increased flexibility convenient for a lot of problems.
• The graph traversal algorithms are true traversals (as in Traversable or Traversal from lens). The breadth/depth first search algorithms are Indexed Bitraversals (Bi-indexed traversals?) over the graph. Having these full-fledged traversals gives a lot of power that I find difficult to emulate with existing libraries.
• Most accessors are integrated with the lens library aggressively. For example, iedgesFrom is an IndexedTraversal' of the edges connected to the given index.
• In the style of fgl, there is also a functional graph decomposition available.

I plan to add a lot more to this (such as classic graph algorithms), but in the meantime I'm looking for feedback on the work I've done so far. Are there things that should be changed? Added? Am I wasting my time? Any and all feedback is welcome!

Thanks!

Specifically, I'm talking about examples (a) and (b) in this wikipedia entry -- particularly attractive are the guidelines. I've searched all around for it. I tried the linguistics entry within this LaTeX wikibook entry, but they don't produce what I think are equally readable graphs. I'm aware that I could manually draw these using something like MS Paint, but that seems too cumbersome.

EDIT: Dr. Tim Osborne, one who prefers these sorts of diagrams and uses them in his papers, got back to me to let me know that he uses Microsoft Word! I was really hoping for something somewhat automated... :/

https://imgur.com/zGrTusp

How am I supposed to graph a coordinate from an equation like this? The directions on the page say: Graph the equations by finding and plotting two or more ordered pair solutions. Draw the graph on the coordinate planes provided. Do not plot ordered pairs that contain non-integers.

Don't I have to make a function from an x and y variable?

Hey guys,

I'm currently trying to write a program for which it would be useful to create a call graph that I can traverse through. Also, it would need to be ordered like , so that I can say for example that method a() gets invoked some time after method b().

Essentially, it would be something quite similar to this Python library except that I need it to not be a graph, but some code fragment I can use to work with further and that I'd need an order in which the methods are invoked.

http://pycallgraph.slowchop.com/en/master/examples/basic.html

Does anyone know something like that and could help me out with this one?

Sorry, but I've tried Googling it, but nothing works.

I want to graph two ordered pairs in one series and another two ordered pairs in a different series. Here's a picture:

http://i.imgur.com/U3FvAoe.png

As you can see, the second is all messed up. It doesn't graph correctly. I've tried different formatting and stuff, but it still won't work.

Thanks

P.S. Can you make the solution noob friendly and for excel 2013? Thanks, I am a beginner in excel.

The title is pretty specific, I'm trying to make a graph, preferably a scatter, with multiple lines but for only two things (ie resistance/area).

First off, I'm struggling to make a graph like this with material A, B, C etc.

For another graph similar to this one, the data is of a different range, some to the power -6, some -8. This is seeming to make the graph glitch out or not work correctly.

Does anyone know how to make a graph like this?

Thanks.

Let's have a standard topological ordering algorithm (from CLRS):

Topological_ordering(G)
    foreach vertex v in V do
        v.color = white
    
    for each vertex v in V do
        if v.color = white then
            Stack = DFS(G, v, Stack)
    return Stack

// DFS

DFS (G, v, Stack)
    v.color = gray
    for each u adjacent of v do
        if u.color = white then
            Stack = DFS(G, u, Stack)
    v.color = black
    Stack.push(v)
    return stack

Now let's apply this to a cyclic graph G.

We will not have a topological ordering of the vertices of G, but we shall have a topological ordering of the graph of the Strongly Connected Components

>The graph of the Strongly Connnected Components derived from the graph G is a graph in which each SCC is represented by only one vertex (also called compressed SCC graph

Example

For example let's look at this graph: https://imgur.com/a/0EXOxJt (sorry for the poor drawing skills). In green the SSC of this graph.

Applying the algorithm above, one possible stack configuration is:

head ----> 2 ; 3 ; 4 ; 5 ; 1 ; 6 , 8 ; 7 ; 9

As you can see the elements of an SCC are "all together". How to prove this mathematically? Thank you.

I've come up with this riddle three years ago for an exam on graph theory. As it is somewhat more technical, I have added a short summary on the subject for those who are not familiar with graph theory.

#The riddle

Let Γ be a simple graph of order n ∈ ℕ, n > 2, with the following two properties:

1. Δ(Γ) - δ(Γ) = n - 2, and

2. n is a divisor of |Aut(Γ)|.

Show that n is a composite number.

#Relevant summary on graph theory

A simple graph Γ is an ordered pair (V, E), where V (vertices) is a non-empty set and E (edges) is a set consisting of subsets of V of size 2.

The order of Γ equals the size of V.

Two vertices that form an edge of the graph are called adjacent.

The degree of a vertex v ∈ V equals the number of edges it belongs to. If D is the set of all degrees occurring in the graph, then Δ(Γ) equals the maximum of these degrees and δ(Γ) the minimum.

An automorphism of Γ is a permutation φ of V such that two vertices are adjacent if and only if their images under φ are adjacent. The set of all such automorphisms form the automorphism group Aut(Γ).

.

I ran into an issue with incorrect ordering of siblings in Relationship Graph reports -- some (but not all) members get placed incorrectly according to their birth order. The Descendant Tree reports have no issue with generating the correct ordering in their trees.

The issue occurs with both GrampsAIO64 v4.2.8 and v5.1.4.

Any info/pointer on how to fix this issue would be much appreciated.

TIA.

I was watching the order book for a stock premarket and the trades executed. The bid was around 7.7 and the ask say 7.8. I saw like 40 shares trade at 7.56 but they never showed up in the order in book. So how would those shares execute below the bid. Did some in one just put an order in without looking at the bid/ask? Also I had a live graph displayed but it never showed any trades that low nor did I see anything in the order book displayed.