In my column, which I’ve written since 2002, I follow the path of patients who sought and found the diagnoses that often changed their lives. My column focuses on patients who have already found an answer. Last year, I embarked on a new adventure: Bringing my passion to understand the process of diagnosis to a documentary series for Netflix — with Times readers at the center. This time my focus was on patients still searching for a diagnosis.
It worked like this: I introduced a series of patients with symptoms, but no answers, to my readers. I shared detailed accounts of each patient’s illness, as well as key components of their medical records. Then we asked readers to tell us what they thought might be the cause.
Hundreds and sometimes thousands of readers from all over the world responded. Many of their suggestions were used in the documentaries. There are seven episodes, featuring eight patients.
I’ve been practicing medicine for nearly 20 years.
Twitter: @LisaSandersmd
Proof: https://i.redd.it/b9cnqhki2uh31.jpg
EDIT, 1:49 pm: Thanks, y’all, for joining me today. And thank you for posing all these great questions. I'm signing off for now but I'll try to check back in later if I can. Lisa
Fund manager Grayscale has partnered up with New York magazine — TIME. The partnership will produce an educational crypto video series. As a media industry’s first, the company will be paid in Bitcoin.
Grayscale’s CEO, Michael Sonnenshein announced the partnership in April. He also revealed that TIME magazine and its president, Keith Grossman, will receive payment in Bitcoin
Read Full Article https://coinquora.com/time-partners-up-with-grayscale-agrees-to-be-paid-in-btc/
https://twitter.com/i/events/1305990311265669120
The New York Times @nytimes
>America's climate crisis is here. And it will change how — and where — people live. Supported by @pulitzercenter, @NYTmag and @ProPublica mapped out how climate change will displace millions of Americans.
>Read part two of our series on climate migration:
>https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1305906494681079809
>-
>By 2070, some 28 million people across the U.S. could face Manhattan-size megafires. In Northern California, they could become an annual event.
>https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1305906655222272001
>By 2060 in Missouri and throughout the Midwest, people will experience weeks of “wet-bulb” temperatures above 82 degrees, a humidity threshold that makes outdoor labor dangerous.
>https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1305906937796669440
>Sea-level rise could displace as many as 13 million coastal residents by 2060, including 290,000 people in North Carolina.
>https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1305907162011574278
>For years, Americans avoided confronting these changes in their own backyards.
>But now, the nation is on the cusp of a great transformation. Across the U.S., some 162 million people will most likely experience a decline in the quality of their environment.
>https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1305907415632744451
>In @NYTMag, Abrahm Lustgarten interviewed more than four dozen experts — economists, climate scientists, insurance executives, architects and urban planners — to map out how climate change will displace millions of Americans over the next 30 years.
>13 million Americans will be forced to move away from submerged coastlines, projections say.
>When counting people contending with wildfires and other risks, the number of displaced Americans could be tens of millions higher. Read the @NYTMag cover story.
>https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1305907873512333316
X S P A article in "TIME Magazine" Great Read - https://time.com/5856039/xpresspa-covid-testing/
I'm a photographer with The New York Times Magazine working on a story about video game addiction. We are currently looking to photograph the spaces of self-identified gaming addicts for our story about video game addiction. We are looking for participants across the USA and possibly Canada. We would include only the space/room/area where your gaming set up is and not include you. We are looking to do a "still-life" of this area to help illustrate the story. If you are interested in possibly participating, I would love to hear from you. You can reply, message me here or email me at damon@damoncasarez.com.
I read a bit of the articles and listened to a few of the podcast and thought it was very well done. It wasn’t until recently, however, that I read that 1619 isn’t completely historically accurate. The article saying this was from a right leaning news source and the main historian it quoted seemed to be right leaning as well (I couldn’t find the article when I went beach and looked for it for this post). So my question is, is there any truth to the claim that 1619 is historically ill informed or wrong?
I frequently write about family and culture for The New York Times Magazine. Today we're going to talk about open marriages (and relationships), which I wrote about in this past Sunday's cover story. For the better part of a year, I followed a few couples around, and spoke to many others, who were committed to nonmonogamy. I was surprised by how much my reporting forced me to think about my own marriage, and the nature of long-lasting love and commitment. I'm happy to answer any questions I can, and hear your thoughts on the subject of monogamy, polyamory and everything in between. UPDATE: Wrapping up here, but thank you all so much for your interest!
And you can read the story here: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/11/magazine/is-an-open-marriage-a-happier-marriage.html
Proof: https://twitter.com/susandominus/status/863031850113130503
