What i wrote to my national regulatory authority to complain about todays bullshit.
I would like complain about my stock broker interactive brokers pty Ltd.
Today they limited my buying and selling of GME stock options. Other users also reported on twitter their orders were not being filled. I tried to buy/sell sell x and _ stated they are restricting the trade of options.
This is tantamount to market manipulation. By restricting retail investors to trade by stating they do not want to take on extra risk ( this is nonsense as I was not using any margin) is not true. Simply put, its my money and I can sell puts if I want to.
Please can you clarify if this is legal under _ law and within the scope of their fiduciary responsibilities as my stock broker.
EDIT: fuck the shorts, buy the dip; can't stop, won't stop, game stop 🚀
I know in 30K, the Custodes only guarded Terra and attended to the Emperor. I read the 40K Custodes novel Watchers of the Throne, where the Custodes see the importance of going to fight wars beyond Terra.
But now I'm stumped as to what the Custodes are actually doing these days, in terms of fighting wars outside Terra. Who decides that the Custodes will go to war, and what does the Custodes going to war look like? How large are the groups Custodes go in?
Any insight into the modern Adeptus Custodes would be appreciated! These guys are so badass (read Master of Mankind before that), them going on the offensive is bad news for the Imperium's enemies.
The Commander in Chief is now The Honorable Joseph R. Biden Jr
The Secretary of Defense is now The Honorable Lloyd Austin
Individual military branch chain of commands may have changed as well.
Have a squad leader who has on two occasions tagged soldiers from another squad for a tasking without consulting that soldier's squad leader. The squad leader is claiming general military authority allows him the ability to do this and that the other squad leader can pound sand anyway because he outranks him.
At a bare minimum this behavior is discourteous to his fellow squad leader and is harming unit morale, but I would also like to have the correct reg on hand so this guy can understand that just because that's what he was told (and probably how he was treated) earlier in his career, that doesn't mean it's correct.
There is an old version of FM 7-22.7 that gives clear definitions of the two types of authority with examples, but the newest version, TC 7-22.7, just references AR 600-20 as providing the definition, where I am unable to find anything in there that conclusively supports my position as the definitions in there are far more vague.
Anyway, I'd like a number four with onion rings please.
