So, you may remember this arc after the "There's Six of Them" one in Stone Ocean. "Marilyn Manson, the Dept Collector". Here, we meet Miraschon, a prisonner made stand user by Pucci. She then goes and confront Jolyne, Hermes and F.F. And something bugged me with her.
I know that her saying "GOOD!" is a callback to the D'Arby brothers in part 3, but given how a child can be very similar to their parents in they general actions, I wanted to dig. Just look at Giorno's stand cry, Jolyne's catchphrase or Josuke's lazy and trickster persona.
My theory is that Miraschon may be the daughter of Daniel J. D'Arby, given that he looks like he's in his 40's in 1988 and Terence is only half his age. Other than the "GOOD!" argument, I also feel like their stands are fairly similar. Osiris being able to take one's soul if they loose to D'Arby and Marilyn Manson being able to take something of value from someone if they lost a bet against Miraschon. We know that similar stands usually means same family. Again, look at Crazy Diamond, Stone Free and Star Platinum, Tomb of the Boom's or even Osiris and Atum.
Plus, the timeline seem to fit, Miraschon seems to be around Hermes and Jolyne's age, aka. In their early 20's. If we admit that D'Arby had her in 1986 at earliest, one year before DIO's reappearance and in 1990 at the latest, a few years after his battle against Jotaro, as I believe that his state of dementia after the "D'Arby the Gambler" arc wouldn't be permanent. Besides, If I remember correctly, the card at the end of the arc said that he was retired. Like Oingo or Mariah.
Plus, given how fate works in Jojo, maybe the D'Arby family's fate is to fight against the Joestars, like how the Zeppeli's are destined to assist the Joestar's.
So ? What do you think ? I know most of it are streches born from one reference, but still, I thought it would be fun to think about it.
"Type 1 : A nick to or slitting of the foreskin; or premature or forcible separation of the prepuce from the glans, without amputation of tissue. Type 2 : Amputation of the portion of the foreskin extending beyond the glans. Type 3 : Amputation of the foreskin at a point partway along the glans;some foreskin and all of the frenulum left; some sliding functionality retained. Type 4 : Amputation of the foreskin at or below the corona of the glans. Type 5 : Other forms of penis mutilation, including meatotomy, sub-incision, infibulation, piercing and implants Type 4 A : Amputation of the foreskin at the corona of the glans,leaving glans fully exposed, but retaining frenulum; little or no sliding functionality; frenular nerves retained. Type 4 B : Amputation of the foreskin at the corona of the glans, also excising frenulum; little or no sliding functionality; no frenular nerves left. Type 4 C : Amputation of the foreskin beyond the corona of the glans,at any point along the penis shaft; all foreskin and variable quantities of shaft skin excised; all frenular nerves lost; zero sliding functionality; high risk of insufficient slack tissue for accommodating tumescence"
"The overwhelming consensus from ancient times until the eighteenth cen-tury, however, has been that the foreskin makes a major contribution to sexualsensation and function. In fact, it is precisely the erotic significance of theforeskin that explains the determination of nineteenth-century doctors to re-move it in order to discourage unauthorized forms of sexual activity, such asmasturbation. Observing that boys masturbated by manipulating their foreskinand girls by stimulating their clitoris, the physicians concluded that male cir-cumcision and clitoridectomy were the appropriate responses to stop these forms of behaviour. Sander Gilman has noted that the late-nineteenth-century German authority Hermann Rohleder advocated circumcision for male masturbators and burning of the clitoris with acid for female; Gilman comments that “circumcision and clitoridectomy were seen as analogous medical procedures.”**The inescapable conclusion is that, while the glans/clitoris and fore-skin/clitoral prepuce may be anatomically analogous, the correct analog
... keep reading on reddit ➡
When the crusaders get to bbeg's mansion the first guy they see is D'arby but he is floating around. Why?
I’m not saying Josie would win but the cat fight would be nice. Josie was a force not to be reckoned with.
He can read yes or no quesdtions.. but he can't know that Jojo is gonna pitch staright at the batter right
"Type 1 : A nick to or slitting of the foreskin; or premature or forcible separation of the prepuce from the glans, without amputation of tissue. Type 2 : Amputation of the portion of the foreskin extending beyond the glans. Type 3 : Amputation of the foreskin at a point partway along the glans;some foreskin and all of the frenulum left; some sliding functionality retained. Type 4 : Amputation of the foreskin at or below the corona of the glans. Type 5 : Other forms of penis mutilation, including meatotomy, sub-incision, infibulation, piercing and implants Type 4 A : Amputation of the foreskin at the corona of the glans,leaving glans fully exposed, but retaining frenulum; little or no sliding functionality; frenular nerves retained. Type 4 B : Amputation of the foreskin at the corona of the glans, also excising frenulum; little or no sliding functionality; no frenular nerves left. Type 4 C : Amputation of the foreskin beyond the corona of the glans,at any point along the penis shaft; all foreskin and variable quantities of shaft skin excised; all frenular nerves lost; zero sliding functionality; high risk of insufficient slack tissue for accommodating tumescence"
"The overwhelming consensus from ancient times until the eighteenth cen-tury, however, has been that the foreskin makes a major contribution to sexualsensation and function. In fact, it is precisely the erotic significance of theforeskin that explains the determination of nineteenth-century doctors to re-move it in order to discourage unauthorized forms of sexual activity, such asmasturbation. Observing that boys masturbated by manipulating their foreskinand girls by stimulating their clitoris, the physicians concluded that male cir-cumcision and clitoridectomy were the appropriate responses to stop these forms of behaviour. Sander Gilman has noted that the late-nineteenth-century German authority Hermann Rohleder advocated circumcision for male masturbators and burning of the clitoris with acid for female; Gilman comments that “circumcision and clitoridectomy were seen as analogous medical procedures.”**The inescapable conclusion is that, while the glans/clitoris and fore-skin/clitoral prepuce may be anatomically analogous, t
... keep reading on reddit ➡"Type 1 : A nick to or slitting of the foreskin; or premature or forcible separation of the prepuce from the glans, without amputation of tissue. Type 2 : Amputation of the portion of the foreskin extending beyond the glans. Type 3 : Amputation of the foreskin at a point partway along the glans;some foreskin and all of the frenulum left; some sliding functionality retained. Type 4 : Amputation of the foreskin at or below the corona of the glans. Type 5 : Other forms of penis mutilation, including meatotomy, sub-incision, infibulation, piercing and implants Type 4 A : Amputation of the foreskin at the corona of the glans,leaving glans fully exposed, but retaining frenulum; little or no sliding functionality; frenular nerves retained. Type 4 B : Amputation of the foreskin at the corona of the glans, also excising frenulum; little or no sliding functionality; no frenular nerves left. Type 4 C : Amputation of the foreskin beyond the corona of the glans,at any point along the penis shaft; all foreskin and variable quantities of shaft skin excised; all frenular nerves lost; zero sliding functionality; high risk of insufficient slack tissue for accommodating tumescence"
"The overwhelming consensus from ancient times until the eighteenth cen-tury, however, has been that the foreskin makes a major contribution to sexualsensation and function. In fact, it is precisely the erotic significance of theforeskin that explains the determination of nineteenth-century doctors to re-move it in order to discourage unauthorized forms of sexual activity, such asmasturbation. Observing that boys masturbated by manipulating their foreskinand girls by stimulating their clitoris, the physicians concluded that male cir-cumcision and clitoridectomy were the appropriate responses to stop these forms of behaviour. Sander Gilman has noted that the late-nineteenth-century German authority Hermann Rohleder advocated circumcision for male masturbators and burning of the clitoris with acid for female; Gilman comments that “circumcision and clitoridectomy were seen as analogous medical procedures.”**The inescapable conclusion is that, while the glans/clitoris and fore-skin/clitoral prepuce may be anatomically analogous, the correct analog
... keep reading on reddit ➡