If both your Ethernet and WIFI are not working (getting 80010201 error after around 10 seconds booting up), but your Bluetooth controller can connect to your PS3 wireless, chances are you are having a WIFI interference issue.
Many people misunderstood my situation, assuming that the network function still works. I need to emphasise that by CRASH, I mean I am getting the 80010201 error, and the network function is DEAD.
My PS3 model is Fat CECHL01.
Solution:
Move to a place without 5GHz and IEEE 802.1x WIFI.
My story:
I am living in a dormitory with tons of WIFI hotspots in IEEE 802.1x protocols. And my PS3 cannot detect any WIFI nor my Ethernet cable. Upon search, I found one post facing the same problem.https://www.reddit.com/r/PS3/comments/6bzval/completely_stuck_cannot_get_ps3_to_connect_to/
So I took my PS3 back home and try it again. It still doesn't work. Then I used my iphone to scan the WIFI one by one to see what WIFI signal is leaking into my house, and I found tons of them in 5GHz from my neighbors (It's a highly populated apartment).
In the end, I had to book a love hotel, and packed my PS3 and HDMI screen into my travel luggage and set it up in the hotel. Guess what, it could scan the WIFI and the network function works again!
So I enjoyed my first love hotel experience with my honey (PS3). Will definitely go there again if I need network function!
I now have two Synology NASes, both capable of bonding four ethernet ports each. I thought that bonding would give me a 4gb channel between the two machines, but I'm still only seeing about 100MB/s transfers via rsync, and running multiple instances of rsync doesn't seem to improve things (they all just drop down to a fraction of 100MB/s, maybe even less combined throughput). Is there any way to get this bonded channel to use its full capacity? 1g ethernet is a SLOOOOW way to backup 100TB. :-p
FWIW, I have skimmed https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/hssg/public/apr07/frazier_01_0407.pdf which led me to believe that as long as I used four separate instances of rsync, each one should avail itself of the available bandwidth of four channels.
EDIT: HyperBackup didn't seem to avail itself of any benefits of 4 port binding either. I was still only getting around 90MB/s average, although I did see some 119MB/s spikes, but then much worse troughs. I'm going back to rsync, and I guess I'll just wait two months for a single backup to complete. sigh
I know in certain cases it has been suggested to NOT get rid of "primary" ISPs, specifically during beta, so my assumption is that this would be supported. I was curious if anyone had first hand knowledge.
Anyone running any aggregated WAN setups with StarLink? To be clear, I'm not talking primary/secondary or dual WAN setups but rather aggregated/simultaneous WAN.
I tried looking online but can't find anything regarding this anywhere.
Hello fellow redditors,
I have two questions on multiple antennas/streams in IEEE 802.11n wifi networks.
- The 2.4 GHz network offers 13 channels in Europe, the typical stream of 20 MHz width takes 4 of those. My notebook features 3 antennas, my router does too. Hence, I should theoretically get a bandwidth of 3 x 75 Mbit/s = 225 MBit/s. Say, my router is in its settings set to channel 5. Do all of these 3 antennas stream on channel 5 or does each antenna take a channel (e.g. 4, 5, 6) or does each antenna take a 20 MHz "block" (ideally 1, 5, 9), making the network almost fully occupied?
- If my router and device support both 2.4GHz and 5 GHz networks, can my device connect to both at the same time and increase the bandwith?
Thanks a lot for your answers!
Does anyone know a link for a neatly outlined list of the IEEE 802.XXX Standards that should be known for CCNA?
I want to build a wireless sensor network for simple monitoring and decided to use Thread as the network protocol. I also want each node to be able to get the distance to nearby other nodes via ToF Ranging / UWB.
In my understanding, Thread is based on 6LoWPAN, which itself is implanted on top of the IEEE 802.15.4 standard. However, I haven't found any information regarding Thread over IEEE 802.15.4z.
Is it possible to implement networking and ranging over one transceiver (eg. DW3000 or similar) or would it be smarter to use a dedicated processor for networking (eg. NRF52 for networking and DW3000 for ranging)?
I’m looking to use IEEE 802.15.4 to connect a multitude of devices together and store the data in a computer/server and allow for smartphone configuration and viewing of real time data of said devices.
Currently working with NXP micro and looking to possibly switching to STM32 micros.
Is it better to use an SoC or just a transceiver? If I wanted to connect to an iOS/Android device I would need a transceiver capable of doing both BLE and IEEE 802.15.4 correct?
Has anyone here implemented IEEE 802.15.4 and if so what specification did you use and why? ZigBee, Thread, 6LoWPAN, etc.
Hola folks,
I consider to get myself a Surface Book 4 for working purposes and can't find any information about the ability of VLAN usage.
Surface Dock 2
Surface USB-C/Ethernet Adapter
are those accessories capable?
and can you also recommend adapters/cables to connect 2 external monitors via DisplayPort from the dock?
thanks in advance :)
Long time ago, my dad purchased these cheap Treadnet routers in a "buy 3 for $30" deal.
A quirk they had was that if WPA2 was enabled, the WiFi connection would constantly drop. I later learned that the router never had the processing power to handle WPA2. I also learned that applying a firmware update through Ethernet can (and in my case, it did) kill the router and knock out the modem for a minute or so.
He later got a cheap Belkin 802.11n router that would have 200-800ms latency whenever someone fired up Youtube or Netflix, so RIP gaming.
The other day, that cheap Belkin router died. But wait, my dad still has two of those Treadnet routers, and he turned on the second one.
He called me asking why 1080p Youtube and Netflix were constantly buffering or dropping quality when more than one person was using the connection. I clearly remembered that the router did not use encryption by default, so I had him open up the router's setting page and take pictures of the logs.
I identified a device that did not belong to him or my mom, aka someone was already using the free WiFi. I told him turning on encryption to boot the intruder off the router would cause the same WiFi connection dropping issue that I caused about a decade ago, so his best option would be to buy a proper router.
He insisted that because 802.11g was rated for 54 Mbps, it should be able to handle the connections even with the intruder, and dismissed my argument of "54 Mbps rating is like those 140 mph speedometer rating on a cheap car with an inline 4 engine, you're not going to hit 140 mph without driving downhill", and that the intruder could be using all of the bandwith that the old router is able to provide.
His plan is to argue with the ISP because he believes it is their fault. I'd say this will be one of those times where the customer is wrong.
On a side note, this was the same person that purchased a Windows Vista netbook back in the late 2000's, with a single-core Atom CPU and 1-2 GB of RAM, "because a laptop is a laptop".
Like I have no experience with gaming computers. Have only played on a laptop. I'm thinking of getting this pre-built with a Wifi IEEE 802.11ax + Gbit LAn. Though there is nothing about Bluetooth, if it doesn't have Bluetooth after I buy it, is there a way to customize it to have Bluetooth? Is it something in the motherboard or another different component?
Edit: here's the link to the pc https://arvutitark.ee/est/tootekataloog/Arvutid-ja-lisad-Lauaarvutid-Brand-Manguri-PC/MSI-MPG-Trident-3-10th-i5-10400F-8GB-HDD-1TB-SSD-512GB-GTX-1660-SUPER-6GB-Win10Home-INTEL-MARVELS-AVENGERS-529953
I have a Netgear X10, an extremely expensive router. I get 900/400 on LAN. However I tried a 2020 laptop, a Netgear A6210 wifi adapter and an iPhone XS Max. They all connect using 802.11a on 5Ghz and 802.11g on 2.4Ghz, placing my speeds at 30/30 and 8/14 respectively. It has been fine for years, (as in like 500/400 on wireless) until recently I got a new PC with the A6210 adapter, but had serious ping spikes in games. I messed around with the QoS settings but it only made it worse. I turned off WMM or whatever and now i never get ping spikes in games but I have terrible internet speeds. Why is it not using Wireless AC or N? I have tried changing to multiple channels for both 2.4 and 5, to no avail. I have Implicit Beamforming, MU-MIMO and 160Mhz on.
Recently spent an entire day in the "Chat Help" area of xfinity, trying to find out why I've been paying for 200Mb/s internet when my wireless gateway is only capable of delivering a maximum of 54Mb/s (that is the max speed of 802.11g wireless protocol). Actual speed test 2 feet from the gateway: about 12Mb/s download...verified on 3 different devices.
They refused to give me a new modem, saying this one is adequate and passed all the troubleshooting steps.
Incidentally, I live in a suburb of Washington DC where Comcast is the only high speed internet provider available, and they know it. They've raised our rate 35% in the past 6 months.
