For those that don't know: Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a charitable manner for the benefit of his employees or customers.
Dodge only owned a 10% stake in Ford Motor yet had courts rule that Henry Ford had to run his company on the interest of shareholders rather than how he see fit; to the benefit of employees and customers.
The court therefore upheld the order of the trial court requiring that directors declare an extra dividend of $19.3 million.
Every since I discovered this I'll never consider driving a Dodge vehicle. Btw I drive a Ford Fiesta and I like it. Not gonna lie but I'd probably buy a bigger car though if we were all paid fair wages, how Henry Ford wanted.
Source:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Co.#:~:text=Ford%20Motor%20Co.,-From%20Wikipedia%2C%20the&text=1919)%20is%20a%20case%20in,of%20his%20employees%20or%20customers.
Mentioned: F - FORD We raise our 12-month price target to $32, representing a '23 P/E of 12.5xand a premium to F's 10-year mean forward P/E of 8.8x due to an expectedre-rating of the shares as EV sales increase. We raise our adjusted EPSestimates by $0.10 to $2.00 for '21, by $0.05 to $2.25 for '22, and introduce'23 at $2.55. Ford posts a 17.1% decline in U.S. auto sales for December,bringing its Q4 U.S. auto sales to 508,451 units (-6.3% Y/Y) and a 26.8%increase over Q3, well ahead of the industry's 3% decline. With additionalmarket share gains coming from the F-150 Lightning, Bronco, and other vehicles,we remain bullish on Ford, expecting a combination of earnings growth andmultiple expansion to propel shares higher as EV sales grow and the stock isvalued less like a single-digit P/E multiple legacy automaker. Furthermore, wehave a high degree of confidence in CEO Jim Farley and view F's globaloperations as having considerable low hanging fruit in terms of additional costand productivity improvement.
The CorrespondenceΒ Theory of Truth is a basic premise that spans from ontologyΒ to philosophicalΒ linguistics to the philosophy of science. It is one of many philosophical approaches we can take when trying to assess a deep human question: what is truth?
The proposal with the CorrespondenceΒ Theory is that truth must "correspond" with our human senses. If our eyeballs see the sky as blue, then the truth of the sky is that it's blue. If a strawberry tastes sweet, the truth of the berry's taste is sweetness. Truth, then, isn't a single, objective concrete object. It's a compromiseΒ of majority perceptions -- if enough people all agree the sky is a common shade we recognize as "blue" based on how their eyes see it, then the sky is blue.
Of course, Correspondence Theory is tricky. It's easy enough when it's something that most people can easily agree upon,Β like the color of the sky. But, if truth comes solely from our own senses, what happens if our senses are different? How can cilantro both have simultaneous truths of tasting delicious AND harsh and soapy, based on different perceptions of the taste?
All that to say this: If truth is a compromise of agreed perceptions, who the fuck was telling Ford that this color is orange?
They list it on their website as "Cyber Orange." And in their promo pics, it does look kinda vaguely orange-ish.
But in real-world photos, every single shot I find of "Cyber Orange" looks banana yellow to me.Β Here here here here here
Has anyone seen the color in person? Does it look orange? Or does it look orange to y'all and my eyes are all fucked up?
Great buy here sfill imo. Iβm holding for 25-30
