A list of puns related to "Crown Act"
So according to Christian mythology, the story goes that Roman soldiers decided to create a 'crown of thorns' to humiliate Jesus for being a 'king of jews'.
While this obviously is religious scripture and so most likely some kind of allegory, what I'm wondering is - did people in the ancient Roman period ever actually do things like this to people who were crucified? Humiliate them further by dressing them up in certain ways, or perhaps degrade them with humiliating acts, or other things of that sort?
I'm at the end of Act 1 at Ascension 20.
My choices are Busted Crown, Calling Bell and Sacred Bark.
My relics are default snake ring, snecko skull, anchor wheel, maw's bank, kunai. I have 315 gp and a power pot.
My deck currently has ascender's bane, 5 strikes, 5 defends, survivor, neutralize, quick slash, dagger throw, blade dance, acrobatics, cloak and dagger, bane, poison stab, deadly poison, catalyst+, burst, nightmare, 2 wraith forms
I don't think my deck needs card choice more than energy right now. Its main issues is lack of upgrades and some junk that needs to be cut.
I feel like crown is the pick here.
Thoughts?
(hoping for pyramid as act 2 reward for epic carnage btw)
https://archiveofourown.org/works/34415734/chapters/87513847
If anyone's interested, Chapter 10 is called "Enter Diplomat" :)
The tram continues through the bustling tunnel, with people moving equipment, supplies, and even some military men doing drills. Rafael looked down. He was thinking about his new job. His anxiety was pretty high. The High Council of the Kingdom had ordered Rafael to come to Terra Profectum to audit the colony, deciding whether or not it would be shut down or if it would continue to be funded. The tram made a right turn through the executive branches of tunnels, where they plopped Rafael right in front of the Administration Ministry. He grabbed his suitcase and stepped off the tram, where he then walked to the sector door and opened it with his ID. He walked through and followed the signs to the Director's office.
Rafael opens the door. He's greeted by the Director, who tells him to sit. Rafael sits down.
"So. Here I am. My decision is not personal. Well, personally, I love space. But you have to convince me that the benefits of keeping this colony are worth it. The United Nations is loading pressure onto the Kingdom to disband the colony and have our leaders face an international court over their... 'war crimes' that they committed during the Outbreak." Rafael states.
"Sir. I had my analysts build up a report on the benefits, cons, and current statistics on the status of the colony. It has an overwhelming number of positive results. And I am eternally indebted to this opportunity the Kingdom has given me. Before the Outbreak, I was just an accountant for some firm. I was smart. Yet... I was never ambitious. I was an underachiever. Nothing interested me. Until the Kingdom opened the gate and let me in. That is what I love about our nation. We're not doing this for money, or power, or our interests. We're doing this for the progress of humanity." The Director spurted.
Rafael took the documents and skimmed over them. He looked back up at the Director. The Director was, understandably, nervous. The Director had put on his fanciest suit and was sweating a lot.
"You remind me of the Prime Minister. He was an underachiever too. Also, is the air conditioning o
... keep reading on reddit β‘Just another mangling of scripture by the Watchtower translators. The word 'owner' is exclusive to the NWT, because all other Bible's translate it. " A virtuous woman is a crown to her husband: but she that maketh ashamed is as rottenness in his bones. Proverbs 12:4 KJV The original Hebrew is 'husband' not 'owner'. What were they smoking when this was translated, or do they really view women as property? I can only shake my head.
These are the same people who claim to be in 'the truth' yet they can't even get their own Bible translated correctly. Hebrews 1:6 was correctly rendered in the 1961 version of the NWT "Let all God's angels worship him (Jesus)" but was changed in the 1984 edition to read, "Let all God's angels do obeisance to him"
And yet, this is the best of the best 'the truth' can come up with--- from their own scholars? I cannot believe a word "this truth" says anymore. With reckless and false prophecies taught as doctrine and it being a disfellowshipping offense to question said doctrine is enough. But then, to top it off, there are these blatant, yet easily avoidable mis-translations.
Well, this organization has brought more shame on God's name than the original Pharisees did in Paul's day when he wrote: "As it is written: "God's name is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you." Romans 2:24 He could just as easily have written this to the WBTS
They always wanted to be different than all the other religions and I will hand that to them---they are different.
They still teach the foreign British Crown 'White Dominion' version of our history to new immigrants. Where our true Maori history and resistance is given the British understatement treatment and leap-frogged over as 'rebel Maori troubles'. Get rid of the mass murdering, thieving Union Jack, Christian Cross & Crown which are the roots of anti Tangata Whenua race hate here. Anyone glossing over this and all the Taua lying under Colonial Institutions can't claim to oppose Hate Speech. They're just playing self-serving games over our continued trauma. Colonial Racism is deliberately ahistorical, except for select picks of their foreign history. But even their Mother England is sliding down the shitter to their corrupt Tory Government and the corrupt American Corporate Regime. While an out of date, historically corrupt version is still promoted here.
" The Government wants to make hate speech a Crimes Act offence and ramp up the penalties for inciting hatred or discrimination.
Details of the long-awaited reforms of the country's hate speech laws were announced by Justice Minister Kris Faafoi on Friday morning.
The six proposed changes include protecting groups from hate speech on the basis of sex, gender, marital status or political opinion, and making βincitement to discriminateβ against the law. It will also boost the maximum sentence for the offence from three months to three yearsβ imprisonment.
"Extreme speech that incites hatred is very real, and is harmful for those who experience it, and for groups that are the target of it,β Faafoi said.
βThe changes, which we are proposing, are not about restricting anyone's ability to engage in debate about issues.
βWhile saying nasty things to someone, or about someone, does not make for healthy and constructive relationship, it is not the type of speech that we are targeting.β
Bolstering hate speech laws was a recommendation of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Christchurch mosque terror attacks. The inquiry found there had only been one prosecution for βintent to incite hostilityβ under the existing law, and two civil claims.
However, the proposed changes to the law are likely to be fraught. There has been s
... keep reading on reddit β‘https://archiveofourown.org/works/34415734/chapters/87923191
Thanks to all who have read so far!
Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.