I've been using my framework laptop for a few months now and I love it, one of the biggest things it's lacking in the hardware I feel though is that there are not options for cellular modules. I work in places where I don't have access to wifi quite often so having a cell module that would allow me to connect to the internet without wifi would be great. is there a 3rd party say wifi card that had this ability built in that works with the framework laptop?
This was a super fun project to work on. As per the title, I used an RPi 4, a doppler radar sensor, an ML model I created with Edge Impulse, the Notecard from Blues Wireless to relay data over cellular, and Ubidots for creating a dashboard report.
I wrote up a full tutorial on Hackster: https://www.hackster.io/rob-lauer/busted-create-an-ml-powered-speed-trap-b1e5d1
Here is the final "product":
https://preview.redd.it/0v5gmr8clsa71.jpg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=71e50206c5c607a1a5ddb566fc0d7c585ad84c41
And here is one of the dashboard reports from Ubidots:
https://preview.redd.it/gsvey9nilsa71.png?width=1143&format=png&auto=webp&s=b5a0ba3421092342174f2cf720be2d88366d5e55
Hi guys. I had iphone xs for 2 years. Then, I updated it to iphone 12 pro. And, unbelievable, I liked xs more. The worst thing is the bad cell connection, or bad cellular module, or bad cellular firmware, whatever.. I have two sim cards from the same company. Both phones are laying near on the table. Signal strength is 2-3 bars of 4 available). iphone xs is connected to lte and data is working, 12 pro is connected to lte and data is not working.
When xs has low lte signal, it switches to 3g. 12 pro doesn’t switch to 3g automatically.
The second trouble is esim card and/or when two cards are installed and working, so phone is heating alot. Phone came with ios 14.4, and I tried ios 14.6, ios 15.4 beta 1 and 2. Beta firmware (v.15) fixes heating. v.14.7 (not sure) fixes data lost.
I decided to change operator that has the best lte coverage in my country. And lte connection is stable at my main workplace, but when I’m in the city, I figured out it’s not loading data at some locations. Before iphone 12 pro, on previous cellular company, I had never had theese troubles.
I heard that apple messed up ios 14, so cell module isn’t doing well.
Tried pixel 4a, and it has no troubles with data, but ios works more smoothly and I have al my data here. I would use my xs, but already gifted it🤷♂️
Did anyone find the solution? Has any of new firmwares fixed connectivity bugs? Which android phone is the best change from iphone? Seems like apple messed up and keep doing that with all new devices. Also I have homepod (setting up took me one hour, looses accessories, u1 doesn’t work, and even nfc). Airpods pro don’t switch normally between devices and sound quality is the worst ever.
considering i am using the aorus wifi ax mother board which supports ram upto 5000mhz, should i get a 4800 mhz ram kit and would it work with 5950x?
G.SKILL RipjawsV 16GB (2x8GB) 4400MHz DDR4 RAM F4-4400C18D-16GVKC
or G.Skill F4-3600C18D-32GTZN Desktop Ram Trident Z Neo Series 32GB (16GBx2) DDR4 3600MHz RGB
which of the above should i get?
Hey guys,
I bought these for my new server and used them briefly before deciding that 192GB is absolutely ridiculous for a file server with a few VMs… I downgraded them and therefore they’re up for sale.
Looking for $32 each or $30 per for all of them, including shipping. Strong preference on selling all 12, otherwise I’d have to charge shipping.
Stamps: https://imgur.com/a/jORDBTm
I am working on a project that involves both LoRa, Bluetooth 5.0 and Cellular networks. All are connected to a Asus TinkerBoard and my Tinkerboard is connected to a Arduino Uno slave. The language I’m using for my project is C. I have been searching for days on google trying to find out what protocals/languages I need to learn. I want to be able to send an SMS over my 5G cellular module and I can’t find a solid answer to my question. I was hoping that I could please find some help here? Thank you so much!
Edit for Link to my specific modem that I’m getting and perhaps some more clarity.
I also have this 4g module that I was planning on using at first. It is a 4g LTE w/3G fallback modem. If I don’t have to buy the 5g model to send an SMS, or if there is no profound difference in protocols between 4g and 5g are negligible, than that would be preferable. I did see that 5g feeds off of GSM and GSM is used in both 4g and 5g (I hope I’m making sense). It would save me $700-800 if I didn’t have to buy the 5g modem. I’m really only considering 5g because 4g will be phased out sometime after 2030. 5g capability could be added later when I have some real money. I guess this is a very obscure 2nd question.
The 4g LTE/3G fallback modem is: Sierra Wireless AirPrime Model MC7455
Edit 2: Thank you for the award! Also the text I’m sending is very basic. Just 25-30 lines of short text at most
Edit 3: The Arduino slave will not be used to send the SMS message.
The less intermediaries the better as one of the goals of my project is to not have something that the end-user will have to pay ongoing service fees for.
I should have stated this earlier so I apologize. I should have mentioned that Python is not the correct language as I need a compiler rather than an interpreter for my project. Thus I am using C
Edit 4: I have not installed the MC7455 on my Tinkerboard yet as I don’t know what I need to get it running other than its drivers or which drivers to get. But that is something I will address in a future post
Edit 5: I have decided to take your advice and stay with my Sierra Wireless MC7455. Thank you for everyone who has replied thusfar. I really appreciate all your help and I'm happy for the number of responses I've gotten thusfar. Thank you a
... keep reading on reddit ➡Lots of research being done in this field but this article gives a good introduction and lists some interesting examples:
http://www.esalq.usp.br/lepse/imgs/conteudo_thumb/Cellular-Memory-in-Organ-Transplants.pdf
Heres' the relevant bit for the price:
DDR5 vs. DDR4 Memory Costs
>Historically, newer memory technology has always commanded close to a 30-40% premium over the previous generation. However, this time, DDR5 includes additional components that have driven the costs up further. As a result, we expect a 50-60% price premium compared to DDR4 at launch.
>It typically takes around 2 years to reach price parity with previous generations, and we expect trends to remain similar with DDR5 modules as well.
Hi All,
I recently switched monitoring providers and was informed that I did not need a cellular backup (which didn't work with the new provider anyway) for my insurance discount. So I removed the cellular antenna (it was just 4 wires).
However, after doing this I have a yellow triangle on my alarm panel. If I press *2 to view it it just says "View Trouble Communications". Pressing the arrows does not show any more detail and just brings me back to the "press # to exit" screen. I can temporarily clear this error, but it comes back after 5 minutes or so.
I *think* the alarm is running a test of the cellular module every so often and when it fails this message is the result. So my question is, how do permanently I stop the alarm from reporting this error?
Panel is DSC 1832.
Keypad is DSC PK5500
Thanks in advance!
In Stallings' Computer Organization and Architecture:
> consider three related concepts for internal memory:
> • Word: The “natural” unit of organization of memory. The size of a word is typi- cally equal to the number of bits used to represent an integer and to the instruc- tion length. Unfortunately, there are many exceptions. For example, the CRAY C90 (an older model CRAY supercomputer) has a 64-bit word length but uses a 46-bit integer representation. The Intel x86 architecture has a wide variety of instruction lengths, expressed as multiples of bytes, and a word size of 32 bits.
> • Addressable units: In some systems, the addressable unit is the word. However, many systems allow addressing at the byte level. In any case, the relationship between the length in bits A of an address and the number N of addressable units is 2^A = N.
> • Unit of transfer: For main memory, this is the number of bits read out of or written into memory at a time. The unit of transfer need not equal a word or an addressable unit. For external memory, data are often transferred in much larger units than a word, and these are referred to as blocks.
Do the three units depend not just on memory devices, but also memory controllers/modules, and also CPU?
Can the same memory device have different words when it is used with different CPUs?
Can the same memory device have different addressable units when it is used with different CPUs?
Can the same memory device have different units of transfer when it is used with different CPUs?
Thanks.
Overview of the ’912 Patent The ’912 patent describes memory modules that purportedly have the capability of expanding the number of memory devices that can be accessed by a computer. The ’912 patent provides: The memory capacity of a memory module increases with the number of memory devices. The number of memory devices of a memory module can be increased by increasing the number of memory devices per rank or by increasing the number of ranks. For example, a memory module with four ranks has double the memory capacity of a memory module with two ranks and four times the memory capacity of a memory module with one rank. Ex. D (’912 Patent) at 2:23–30. 13
Case 1:21-cv-01453-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/15/21 Page 14 of 82 PageID #: 14 A given total amount of module memory (e.g., 4GB) may be provided by using a small number of high-density memory devices or a large number of low-density memory devices. The ’912 patent states: Market pricing factors for DRAM devices are such that higher- density DRAM devices (e.g., 1Gb DRAM devices) are much more than twice the price of lower-density DRAM devices (e.g., 512 Mb DRAM devices). In other words, the price per bit ratio of the higher- density DRAM devices is greater than that of the lower density DRAM devices.
Netlist appears to allege that the Per DRAM Addressability (“PDA”) mode, as described in JESD79-4C and JESD82-31A, practices certain limitations of claim 16 of the ’912 patent. Netlist has alleged that the PDA mode allows programmability of a given device on a rank using the Mode Register Set (“MRS”) function. In addition, Netlist has alleged that the Rank Multiplication Mode as described in JESD82-30 for LRDIMM DDR3 Memory Buffer (MB) Specification practices certain limitations of claims 1, 15, 28, 39, 77, 80, 82, 86, 88, and 90 of the ’912 patent. For at least the reasons explained in Count IV, the Samsung DDR4 Memory Modules do not infringe the ’912 patent.
Netlist is also obligated to license the ’912 patent on RAND terms to implementers of certain DDR4 Standards. Upon information and belief, Netlist wrote a letter to JEDEC on April 1, 2010, disclosing the ’912 patent in connection with the JC40 and JC42 committees. Ex. J (’912 Letter). Netlist submitted a Letter of Assurance on November 22, 2010 related to DDR2 and DDR3 technology, Ex. K (’912 LOA), but withdrew that commitment on December 6, 2010, when Netlist submitted a Notice of Refusal, Ex. L (’912 Refusal). Netlist withdrew its Notice of Refusal
... keep reading on reddit ➡(Netlist mentioned in this article!)
Global Non-Volatile In-Line Memory Module (NVDIMM) Market Forecast 2021-2026 report offers a breakdown by enterprise factors based primarily on type, applications and geographic regions. The growth techniques followed with the help of these groups are studied in detail within the report. The market size segment delivers the revenues of the Non-Volatile In-Line Memory Module (NVDIMM) market, each masking historical market growth and forecasting the future. The report also includes several valuable insight into the Non-Volatile In-Line Memory Module (NVDIMM) market size, derived from various industry sources. The report studies the competitive environment of the non-volatile in-line memory module (NVDIMM) industry share is based on company profiles and their efforts to increase product value and production.
Get Sample PDF of Report at - www.businessgrowthreports.com/enquiry/request-sample/18943155
The Non-Volatile In-Line Memory Module (NVDIMM) Market report covers the manufacturers data including: shipping, price, revenue, gross profit, interview record, business distribution etc, this data helps the consumer to know better the competitors. This report elaborates the Non-Volatile In-Line Memory Module (NVDIMM) market size, market characteristics, and market growth and breaks down according to Type, Application and Consumption Area of Non-Volatile Memory Module (NVDIMM). non-volatile in-line memory (NVDIMM). The report also conducted a PESTEL analysis of the sector to study the main influencing factors and barriers to entry in the sector.
List of Top Manufacturer Details on the Non-Volatile In-Line Memory Module (NVDIMM) Market:
Netlist, Inc. Hewlett Packard Company Micron Technology, Inc. SMART Modular Technologies, Inc. Micron Technology, Inc. AgigA Tech Fujitsu Limited Intel Corporation Integrated Device Technology, Inc. Toshiba Corporation Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. Diablo Technologies, Inc Viking Technology, Inc.
Covid-19 Impact (Corona Virus): In early 2021, the COVID-19 disease began to spread around the world, millions of people around the world were infected with the COVID-19 disease, and the world's major countries implemented foot bans and cut-off orders. work. Except for the medical supply and life support products industries, most industries have been severely affected and the Non-Volatile In-Line Memory Module (NVDIMM) industries have also been severely affected.
To understand how the impact of
... keep reading on reddit ➡Is anybody else getting flooded with emails from SimpliSafe regarding the needed cellular module update? Got the first 5! emails on Monday all about the same subject and all at the same time.
Ordered Monday and today getting another 4 emails including "final notices", fourth reminders, etc. to install the module that is still in transit...
This is a bit crazy. Replied to them already but these emails do not stop. Feel like they a mocking me.
https://preview.redd.it/jk1meoffnw571.jpg?width=557&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=923adeb31c5f8b14bebf18cbbe9d18d403de6039
Whatever theory helps a fan sleep at night, I guess.
There is no rules indicating how big/expensive the memory device is , but I guess it would be some how like 10nuyen/day of recording.
Imagine having a simrig and sim module , one can record every moment in his life and store it.
Yes , it is not perfect memory that one can just instantly remember something. But it is close enough , specify the date and time , and you can re memory the memory. I can think about so many use for that. The first is just like in cyberpunk2077 , analys details one may not notice in real time.
This is somewhat an overclocking question and not. I read other articles on this sort of thing but wanted to ask about my particular case too. Relevant hardware first: My motherboard is an ASUS PRIME X370-PRO, my CPU is an AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, and my memory modules are HyperX Fury RGB... my video card is also AMD.
The memory modules I have (4 x 8 GB) are 3200 MHz CL 16. When the motherboard is left at its default settings, they are instead ran at only 2400 MHz: To get them at the specified frequency I need to either use an XMP profile or manually set the frequency in the AI Tweaker. Only today I noticed this change goes together with the FCLK: The BIOS sets it to 1200 MHz for 2400 MHz and 1600 MHz for 3200 MHz.
Both configurations appear to be stable. Still I still wanted to ask which you recommend running: The motherboard's auto settings (1200 / 2400) or the RAM module's specification (1600 / 3200)? I'm not officially looking to overclock my system, I care for durability and saving power the most... both seem to be official settings however, so it feels like I get to choose between whether I want the mobo or memory's defaults.
First thing I wanted to know is how much more power the higher frequency settings use... meaning power usage, heat produced, and if it wears the hardware out faster: From what I can tell there's a tiny difference, the system feels like it's just a little bit cooler on the temperature sensors though. Otherwise I wanted to know if there's any point in terms of performance: Am I likely to sense any noticeable difference in practice, in games or otherwise?
The system works fine yet I found out this error message in Memory tab under "About This Mac".
It would go away after restarting the machine, only to come back after a while.
No apps crashing, no kernel panic, no interrupted jobs.
Any suggestions?
BTW, it's an OWC RAM module with Limited Lifetime Warranty. Should I get it replaced?
https://preview.redd.it/kldboc4i9i581.png?width=1396&format=png&auto=webp&s=7d90ef2cdbf86f82c32c20d84506d4c076aa3a03
Swindler effects the gulf v2
pastFX patriarch
skreddy p19
Skreddy lunar module(non deluxe)
Lovepedal valvereamer
Lovepedal les lius
Lovepedal 5e3 deluxe
Tc sub n up
Ehx memory toy
Fairfield unpleasant surprise clone
orange comp clone with level knob
behringer reverb machine
whammy IV
Mostly looking for a fancy reverb. Would love a context v2. (Ive got a fathom and slo on my main board.) always into modulation. Mostly good on dirt but shoot your shot, I suppose. Offers!
Is there any information on how using memory modules in a different order can impact overclocking results?
Example: there are two modules on a dual-slot motherboard - module "1" in A slot and module "2" in B slot. I reseat and put module "1" in B slot and put module "2" in A slot.
Asking because I had to take my RAM from my PC recently because I had to troubleshoot another system and my very fine-tuned memory OC still passes full 3 cycles TM5 anta777 extreme, but shows an error or two in Prime95 after 3-4 hours. So I am confused if this instability was always there and I just didn't test it long enough before (or something else like the room is slightly warmer now), or is it because I probably reseat them in a different order. Am I crazy to suppose that one module is slightly better than the other and the OC was stable before because I used the "worse" module in a "better" slot closer to the CPU socket?
