I can't find a clear difference in the two minus the vis laser on the cqb. The few things I can find is that the otal looks to have a stronger laser and also has a diffuser. What's the cqb like? Is it the same laser just no diffuser? My plan is to run a kiji illuminator and a laser unit but I can't make a clear choice on the two. If the cqb has a weaker laser will the kiji cover it up?
Cecil Tucker is by far the hardest bounty, I can’t even get him on 4 star
Any bounty hunters out there care to give me a hand to go and get him alive?
Has to wait like 20 minutes for cecil to arrive, he died instantly, i died, and then i restarted at my last checkpoint with a ied up, living cecil. When i turned him in, though, i only got $18
What really happened at Sacrifice 2006? Why did Scott Steiner lose when the numbers spelt disaster for Samoa Joe (and implicitly, glory for Steiner?) I set out to answer this riddle that has divided wrestling fans for a generation.
Under triple threat rules, the first wrestler to successfully pin or submit another wrestler is victorious, meaning there's a winner, a loser, and a wrestler who was not involved in the decision - they are still a "loser", but they did not lose the match.
Therefore, to best understand Scott Steiner's famous promo, one must first see the conclusion of a triple threat match (the "finish") and the aftermath (who wins, and in this case leaves Sacrifice as TNA champion) as two discrete stages where there's a single loser in the first and two losers in the second. Another way of thinking of it is to view the match as a series of potential singles matches.
Triple threats are implicitly no-DQ, so assuming a clear winner the possible finishes are:
- Samoa Joe pins or submits Scott Steiner: We know the odds of this are exactly 25%. Steiner says as much.
- Kurt Angle pins or submits Scott Steiner: Literally impossible, 0%. Kurt KNOWS he can't beat Steiner, so he won't even try.
- Kurt Angle pins or submits Samoa Joe: 50%. Many assume Kurt had no chance of winning the match, including Steiner himself, but I posit this is incorrect because Kurt does not, in fact, have to beat Steiner. He just needs to beat Joe, while preventing Steiner from being involved in the decision. Steiner says that "ordinarily" when two wrestlers wrestle either's chance of winning is 50/50, so we can assume that's the case for any finish involving Samoa Joe and Kurt Angle but NOT Scott Steiner.
- Samoa Joe pins or submits Kurt Angle: 50%, for reasons explained above.
- Scott Steiner pins or submits Samoa Joe: Well, if Joe has a 25% chance to beat Steiner, then Steiner has a 75% chance to beat Joe. Simple.
- Scott Steiner pins or submits Kurt Angle: 100%. If this is the decision, then Steiner's victory is assured.
Since each wrestler's chances of winning or losing to another wrestler adds up to 100%, and there are three wrestlers, we need to add their respective chances of winning together and divide by three to get their true chance of victory:
Samoa Joe: (25+50)/3 = 25%
Kurt Angle: (50+0)/3 = 16.66% repeating
Scott Steiner: (75+100)/3= 58.33% repeating
We can see that Steiner is the clear favorite. But remember, if Kurt Angle wasn't involved, his
... keep reading on reddit ➡
