Barron V. Baltimore Puns

I’ve been reading about Incorporation and have been struggling to find how SCOTUS reached such a conclusion. When reading the Bill of Rights, and considering it was the national constitution, how on earth did they interpret it to mean ‘sub-national entities are exempt’ yet national law applied to the whole federation? The Bill of Rights was national law in a way that feel obvious to me. From looking around it appears that their answer was a political cop-out, saying ‘well, it says “States” in this part, but not these important parts that are very general, so bc it’s not technically there, States don’t have to follow it.”

Am i missing something? All the websites I’ve gone to just start from unincorporation, but never explain the basis of it. Please do not be stingy on details.

Part 1: Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Part 2: Chisholm v. Georgia (1793)

Part 3: U.S. Term Limits V. Thornton (1995)

Part 4: McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Part 5: Nix v. Hedden (1893)

Part 6: Wickard v. Filburn (1942)

Part 7: U.S. v. Lopez (1995)

Part 8: Katz v. U.S. (1967)

Part 9: U.S. v. Miller (1976)

Part 10: Kyllo v. U.S. (2001)

Part 11: Carroll v. U.S. (1925)

Part 12: Roe v. Wade (1973)

Part 13: Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)

Part 14: U.S. v. Wilson (1833)

In the early 1830's, the city of Baltimore, Maryland undertook a project that modified several streams that emptied into Baltimore harbor. The harbor was home to a profitable wharf operated by a man named John Barron. During the course of the project, sediment was stirred up from upstream and eventually deposited in the harbor, ultimately leading to a reduction in productivity and profitability of Barron's wharf due to the change in the depth of the water. Barron sued, claiming that the government of Maryland deprived him of property without just compensation, as required by the 5th Amendment. Taking place prior to the ratification of the 14th Amendment in 1868, it was not clear whether the 5th Amendment applied to the exercise of state governmental power or only the

I was assigned to explain what parts of different amendments did certain court cases cover. I was assigned the 9th amendment, and my court case is Barron v. Baltimore. I can not seem to understand how they connect, and if anyone could shed some possible light, I would appreciate it.

From Barron's magazzine today

" The cheapest relative to their average price targets were Viatris (ticker: VTRS), Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (REGN), Incyte (INCY), and Catalent (CTLT). Last month’s search of biopharma names produced the same list, although instead of Catalent, we landed Merck (MRK)."

VTRS could be be the under-the- radar surprise and could double in 12 to 18 months, if management succeeds in smoothly integrating the UpJohn division of Pfizer with Mylan Labs and reducing the costs.

One is getting all these brands (one or more which you could have used at one time or another ! )

https://www.viatris.com/en/Products/Brands

I was in class, and I just randomly thought of this? Does anyone have an answer

It was a half-century ago today, January 17, 1971 that the Baltimore Colts beat the Dallas Cowboys in the worst game in NFL history. This was the first SB contested between AFC and NFC champions, as the first four pitted the champions of the still-separate AFL and NFL.

I remember watching the game, we lived in Maryland at the time but my dad, a Wisconsin-born Packers fan, *hated* the Colts with a passion, and all I remember is him yelling at the TV screen about how inept Cowboy's QB Craig Morton was and how he was going to have to face the gloating of Colts fans at work the next day, LOL.

Morton was inept, he posted a passer rating of 34.1 for the game, but he was far from the only inept element in the game. The Colts committed 7 turnovers, still a record for the most by a winning SB team. Talk about a record that has stood the test of time, LOL. Dallas countered that with 4 turnovers and 10 penalties of their own. The game also featured a botched XP, a tipped 75-yard TD pass from the legendary Johnny Unitas and the weirdest fumble-out-of-the-end-zone-for-a-touchback play anyone has ever seen.

In the end, while the game was decided on a last-second FG, it was the Colts defense, that held Dallas to just 9 first downs and 217 total yards, that was the key factor in the game.

The game marked a changing of the guard of sorts. This was the last of 5 NFL title games played in by Unitas. Earl Morrall earned the ring that had eluded him two years before in the Colts famous upset loss to the Jets in SB III. He would win two more rings backing up Bob Griese with the Dolphins. The city of Baltimore would next celebrate a Super Bowl champ 29 years later, while the Colts franchise would wait 35 years for theirs.

Thanks his poor play, Morton was benched in 1971 and Roger Staubach would become the Dallas starting QB, leading the Cowboys to their first SB title the very next season. Morton would collect a ring sitting on the bench, and then seven year later, Morton would lose another ring - to Staubach as the Cowboys beat Morton's Broncos in SB 12. But Super Bowl V remains one bad memory for the ages.

UPDATE #1 (2:15pm ET): Proof.

UPDATE #2 (3:25pm ET): I'm going to take a break and grab some lunch, but keep the questions coming! I'll be back soon.

UPDATE #3 (3:54pm ET): I'm back! What else perplexes you about God or religion?

UPDATE #4 (4:51pm ET): Thanks everyone! I'm heading out now to confirm over a hundreds kids at a nearby parish, but I'll check back in tonight to answer more questions.

I’m excited to be back for my third AMA! I'll be taking questions on Wednesday, April 21, from 2:00pm-3:30pm ET.

I’m here to discuss whatever most perplexes you about God, faith, Catholicism, or the spiritual life. Ask me anything!

I’m Bishop Robert Barron, founder of Word on Fire Catholic Ministries, Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, and host of two award-winning film series that have aired on PBS.

I’ve spoken about religion at the headquarters of Facebook, Google, and Amazon. I’ve also enjoyed talking about God with atheists such as Alex O’Connor (aka @CosmicSkeptic) and Dave Rubin.

Earlier this week I shared a wide-ranging dialogue with Jordan Peterson, on his podcast, about God, religion, the Bible, psychology, and the spiritual life.

I received a master’s degree in philosophy from the Catholic University of America in 1982 and a doctorate in sacred theology from the Institut Catholique de Paris in 1992. I served as a visiting professor at the University of Notre Dame and at the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas, and was twice scholar in residence at the Pontifical North American College at the Vatican.

In 2018, I became the first Catholic Bishop to host a Reddit AMA.

In 2019, I hosted another AMA, which drew nearly 15,000 comments, becoming the 9th most-commented-on AMA in Reddit history! I tried to answer as many as I could.

Both were great experiences, so I wanted to come back and do it again!

My website, https://WordOnFire.org, reaches millions of people each year, and I'm one of the world's most followed Catholics on social media:

3.2 million+ Facebook fans

400,000+ YouTube subscribers

170,000+ [Twitter followers](https:

For those who have taken the AFOQT, did Barrons or Trivium help you best? I've noticed that Trivium is harder than Barrons and includes a wider variety of math problems. Barrons keeps it pretty simple. Did anyone feel underprepared or over prepared using either of these books?

https://youtu.be/MLnWJZiaiQ0

The Supreme Court is reviewing a lawsuit between the City of Baltimore and British Petroleum over Climate Change related damages. The question is whether this case should be heard in state court of federal court. Here is exactly what’s happening.

In Barron v. Baltimore, it was established that the Bill of Rights only applied to the federal government and not the states. How does this work if America is all just a bunch of states?

https://youtu.be/MLnWJZiaiQ0

The Supreme Court is reviewing a lawsuit between the City of Baltimore and British Petroleum over Climate Change related damages. The question is whether this case should be heard in state court of federal court. Here is exactly what’s happening.

https://youtu.be/MLnWJZiaiQ0

The Supreme Court is reviewing a lawsuit between the City of Baltimore and British Petroleum over Climate Change related damages. The question is whether this case should be heard in state court of federal court. Here is exactly what’s happening.

https://youtu.be/MLnWJZiaiQ0

The Supreme Court is reviewing a lawsuit between the City of Baltimore and British Petroleum over Climate Change related damages. The question is whether this case should be heard in state court of federal court. Here is exactly what’s happening.