WITHOUT USING THE STANDARD TRIGONOMETRIC RATIOS (sin30, sin60 and stuffs)
About us: weβre both conventionally attractive working professionals. Heβs tall, fit, has a gorgeous smile, and absolutely hilarious. Iβm petite, a bit of a little, and frequently laugh at my own jokes. We spend most of our time at home playing video games on our computers or cuddling on the couch watching various movies and shows. Our game preferences vary, but generally you can find us playing a mix of LoL, Path of Exile, WoW, Spelunky, and a whole steam library full of local co-op games. We can chat on reddit for a bit and then see where things go. I mean, who doesn't like being able to send silly memes and gifs to not one, but TWO people at 3 o'clock in the morning? Once we're all comfortable with each other, we'd love to get together (whether it be individually or not) and grab food (and drinks?) somewhere! Something casual and relaxed (aka Chick-Fil-A). Youβre more than welcome to come over and play video games with us if you so prefer! We live about 30 minutes from Seattle and can host :) Oh, and we have two adorable cuddly cats who shed like bandits. Hopefully you're not allergic because there's cat hair EVERYWHERE. Maybe we'll vacuum for you, though. MAYBE.
As far as what this relationship turns into, we have no expectations. It could become a V, a polyfidelitous triad, something in between, or none of the above. Ideally our relationship would be a non-hierarchical closed triad - we've spent a lot of time and energy discussing our needs and desires and have found this to be our ideal dynamic (specifically, not a T). If that doesn't work for you, that's cool! This relationship is for the three of us to explore and discover together and allow things to fall into place as we go along. We've had experience with a closed triad before and it was something that brought us great joy. 3 people smushed into a queen bed with 2 cats is both terrible and amazing. We both have a lot of love to give and we're hoping to find another person to create a special family with. We highly value communication in our relationships and are very open and honest with each other and we want you to be, too. No one likes having those hard, heavy conversations about feelings but sometimes they're necessary. We hope to be able to quell your fears, satiate your desires, and fill your heart with more love than you can imagine.
If you want to get a feel for my husband's sense of humour and kinks, check out
... keep reading on reddit β‘
https://preview.redd.it/uh61oqgva4281.jpg?width=1920&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4d2643bfdd4023f2b2acd8db00cab1cad5790f75
#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
int main()
{ int x, y, z;
int max, key =0;
cout<< "Enter the first side: " << endl;
cin >> x;
cout<< "Enter the second side: " << endl;
cin >> y;
cout<< "Enter the third side: " << endl;
cin >> z;
max = x;
if (y>max)
max = y;
if (z>max)
max = z;
if (max == x)
{
if(pow(max,2) == pow(y,2)+pow(z,2))
key = 1;
}
if (max == y)
{
if(pow(max,2) == pow(x,2)+pow(z,2))
key = 1;
}
if (max == z)
{
if(pow(max,2) == pow(x,2)+pow(y,2))
key = 1;
}
if (key =1)
{
cout << "Triangle is right angled" << endl;
} else{
return 0
}
}
This has always bugged me and I need to spread the word. A live triangle is when three characters love each other. A perfect example of an actual love triangle is Shakespeares Twelfth Night. Viola loves the Duke. The Duke loves Olivia. Olivia loves Viola, who is disguised as a man under the name Cesario. This is a live triangle. Somehow, every character is in love with someone in the triangle.
An acute angle is two points meeting and creating a third connecting point that is less than 90Β°. Thus is what a love acute is. Two characters love one character, the connection point. Let's take a popular "love triangle" Twilight. Both Edward and Jacob love Belle. Thus, creating the two points, both connecting to create Belle. A prior live triangle would be this. Belle lives Jacob. Jacob loves Edward. Edward loves Belle. Another example is Naruto. With Naruto and Sasuke love Sakura, in the early parts of the show. That is not a love triangle. This is a love acute.
Now that I have explained what makes a love triangle, given a perfect example. As well as explaining and giving examples of what a love acute is and given some examples, CAN WE PLEASE STOP SAYING THINGS ARE LOVE TRIANGLES WHEN THEY ARE CLEARLY LOVE ACUTES.
Thank you for coming to my TedTalk.
PS: I chose love acute instead of other angles cause it has "cute" in it. :)
Hello, I'm a guy who failed maths back in high school and doesn't know much past basic algebra, Pythagorus' Theorum and SOHCAHTOA, but I am trying to create an excel calculation tool to give me some missing lengths based on provided inputs that end up creating a right angle triangle, but the information available is only a partial length, the angle, and a length of a side of an irregular quadrilateral within the right angled triangle.
Based on the diagram I've drawn up can someone please guide me through the step-by-step on how to solve this? Or even just what I should be searching for to learn? Thanks heaps!
So, suppose we have a right angled triangle. The angles are 90Β°, x and y. Now x has an exterior angle too, letβs call it z. Now, if I want to take the sine of x, would that be equal to sine of z (since they have same perpendicular and base). That is how my book used it.
Sorry, if I worded anything incorrectly or weirdly. English is not really my first language.
According to the unit circle definition of sine, sine is equal to the y-coordinate value of point A in this figure.
Now consider a point F on the x-axis equal to the x-coordinate of point A (so itβs right beneath the point A), and isolate the triangle OAF.
Now if we apply the right-angled triangle definition of sine, we would get the sine of the angle equal to (FA/OA), while previously the sine of the angle was only FA. How can we explain this seeming discrepancy?
Thank you for taking the time to read my question.
