A list of puns related to "Workhouse Test Act 1723"
Got the photos first thing before the crowds picked up. The booth was pretty busy the entire day. I was able to meet Richard Dauch, Steve Schrader CFO and many from the marketing team. Also some of the guys from the Pritchard Company. What a great bunch. According to Richard they are currently working on some design changes to increase the payload on the C-1000 from the current 2500 lbs. to a 4000 to 5000 lb. load carry capacity. Of course one of the top company priorities is getting the production up to speed, but they couldnβt divulge any numbers at this time.One of the fellows from Prichard told me they have orders in for 500 units and that we should be very happy when the next earnings report comes out. Bullish as ever after meeting with the Workhouse crew. Keep in mind Iβm a crayon eating ape and may have just dreamed all this after a few beers last night so donβt take it as solid financial advise. π¦π¦ππππππ€π€π―π₯³
https://preview.redd.it/evdp3ox4ftk71.jpg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b4ec8aedf74065bf4b679d176567eb29ce43165f
https://preview.redd.it/fbfk9ox4ftk71.jpg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4bd2a48129169f066d6004451629b1cbdfe0e2ad
https://preview.redd.it/nttwpmx4ftk71.jpg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3951f09d97ace2c116afbcca7b2dcf495c5c5534
https://preview.redd.it/3jbtzmx4ftk71.jpg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e329d4ef19b8cd2bdbb5c67bc7d966a178d98560
https://preview.redd.it/murx3nx4ftk71.jpg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3d0898ec092b2b9e1344d900bca42174faf53917
Link to report: https://files.ontario.ca/moh-covid-19-report-en-2020-12-02.pdf
Detailed tables: Google Sheets mode and HTML of Sheets
Global Comparison (Last 14 days/100k / % positive (week)) - Full list on Tab 6 and 6a (USA) of my spreadsheet
Reporting_PHU | Today | Averages->> | Last 7 | Prev 7 | Per 100k->> | Last 7/100k | Prev 7/100k | Source (week %)->> | Close contact | Community | Outbreak | Travel | Ages (week %)->> | <40 | 40-69 | 70+ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 1723 | 1720 | 1388.5 | 90.8 | 73.3 | 44.5 | 42.9 | 12.8 | -0.2 | 52.1 | 38.4 | 9.4 | ||||
Peel | 500 | 481.6 | 414 | 244 | 209.7 | 62.6 | 28.2 | 8.8 | 0.4 | 56.9 | 36.8 | 6.4 | ||||
Toronto PHU | 410 | 519.7 | 418.1 | 133.2 | 107.2 | 24.2 | 69.1 | 6.3 | 0.4 | 52.3 | 39.2 | 8.4 | ||||
York | 196 | 173 | 150.4 | 109.1 | 94.9 | 55.7 | 30.1 | 13.5 | 0.6 | 46.8 | 44.7 | 8.4 | ||||
Durham | 124 | 76.7 | 41.7 | 83.1 | 45.2 | 35.2 | 27.2 | 36 |
Many schools in the US like the UC system are switching to test optional policies. They claim they are doing this because these tests are biased against minority students, however due to COVID many testing sites were closed.
Originally, from what I understand, the UC system started using standardized tests in 1968 because there were students (like Jumaane Williams, who claims he was able to get an education precisely because he had the test scores) who didnβt have good grades but had academic potential.
By putting a higher emphasis on grades, which vary from school to school, this may end up hurting students from low income areas more, as high income schools tend to have more grade inflation: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2021/11/09/research-links-rise-college-completion-grade-inflation
To me, it seems like standardized tests are the best way to control for many of these differences because everyone gets the same (or at least a similar) test. By switching to test-optional policies, many Asian students could be disadvantaged.
Note that I am not arguing that standardized tests should be the only factor in admissions, just that it can set a minimum for entry at many schools as it is a good predictor of college success, similar to the GRE.
Many students, like myself, could care less about test prep and see it as a waste of time. Yet I was still able to get a good (not great, ~2200) score and get into a great undergraduate school and almost every graduate program.
Things that will change my view include (but are not limited to)
People be yourselves!. Embrace who you are, you don't need to make an excuse for it!
So far I have found a-php, alpha-php, and cyclazodone. Which of the is the best option for what I am looking for as far as effect. Meth just dumps a bunch of dopamine and ruins the receptors. I still want the dopamine/adrenaline effect for focus and stamina at my new construction job, but I also want want my sleep and don't want to completely ruin my receptor sites. Also I am going on probation in a couple months so it cant show up a drug test, and as far as I know, the ones I mentioned above do not. I have already ordered several 16 panel drug testing cups. Also I would prefer a solution if possible, but if not I am fine if its only available in powder or crystal. Any advice or suggestions for which RC has the best effect and any suggestion for other stimulant RCs would be much appreciated.
Introduced: Sponsor: Rep. Mark Takano [D-CA41]
This bill was referred to the House Committee on House Administration which will consider it before sending it to the House floor for consideration.
He scored a 25 in December on the science portion and was really bummed (though he hadn't done any prep, so...)
Today I timed him on just that segment from the act website - sample test, five segments, 35 minutes to answer. I printed it out for him to take, so it'd be as comparable as possible.
He only missed two questions.
He claims it was way easier than the December test and doesn't feel like it was a good benchmark; it didn't boost his confidence at all.
Could he be right about the sample test?
Just printed out a practice test and want to emulate the real test the best I can. Is it just one entire booklet? Do I staple it all together? Or is it four separate test booklets that I staple together separate from one another?
This doesn't really matter at all but I guess I'm just pedantic like that π€·ββοΈ
applied as an incoming freshman & could not find information online saying if self reported scores are fine or if official ones are needed:)
Link to report: https://files.ontario.ca/moh-covid-19-report-en-2020-12-02.pdf
Detailed tables: Google Sheets mode and HTML of Sheets
Global Comparison (Last 14 days/100k / % positive (week)) - Full list on Tab 6 and 6a (USA) of my spreadsheet
Reporting_PHU | Today | Averages->> | Last 7 | Prev 7 | Per 100k->> | Last 7/100k | Prev 7/100k | Source (week %)->> | Close contact | Community | Outbreak | Travel | Ages (week %)->> | <40 | 40-69 | 70+ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 1723 | 1720 | 1388.5 | 90.8 | 73.3 | 44.5 | 42.9 | 12.8 | -0.2 | 52.1 | 38.4 | 9.4 | ||||
Peel | 500 | 481.6 | 414 | 244 | 209.7 | 62.6 | 28.2 | 8.8 | 0.4 | 56.9 | 36.8 | 6.4 | ||||
Toronto PHU | 410 | 519.7 | 418.1 | 133.2 | 107.2 | 24.2 | 69.1 | 6.3 | 0.4 | 52.3 | 39.2 | 8.4 | ||||
York | 196 | 173 | 150.4 | 109.1 | 94.9 | 55.7 | 30.1 | 13.5 | 0.6 | 46.8 | 44.7 | 8.4 | ||||
Durham | 124 | 76.7 | 41.7 | 83.1 | 45.2 | 35.2 | 27.2 | 36 |
Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.