Aya is still working on verifying my education credentials and claims they have not heard from their 3rd party who verifies education. I have everything else verified and submitted my documentation ahead of the deadline. My set date was to be tomorrow the December 29th so I have booked housing and flight. I had to reach out to them to see what was going on and they let me know that if their 3rd party doesn't verify my education by noon then they will push the start date of contract.
What can I do in regards to this? Has anyone experienced this? Is this legal or are they breaking contract?
My title is basically the TLDR of situation.
I'm in Indiana, I work through a contracting agency for an alphabet company that supplies electricity to people. The contract agency requires yearly drug screens and mine is coming up this week. Typically this is no issue for me as I haven't touched any drugs or alcohol in many years.
Unfortunately I had some medical issues last week that were misdiagnosed initially, so Sunday I had to visit the ER. During this visit I was given a prescription for a controlled pain killer that has been known to cause failures on drug screens in the past.
I'm about to submit my paperwork to my contract agency giving them authorization for my drug screen. They are well aware of my recent medical absence and have already received my medical excusal for the days missed from my doctor.
Should I also include a preface describing what I said above?
Should I try to get a statement from my doctor stating I'm on a prescription that may cause interference with the drug screen?
Or should I only disclose my prescription to the clinic that performs the drug screen at the time of the actual screen?
I am not talking about delaying, just about failure, like something goes wrong with the fork or whatever... Looking to buy in but don't have time to do a ton of research. What are the consequences of a failed launch? Can we try to launch it again shortly after, or are the consequences significant? Thanks.
PS: New to cardano
Lets start the week with a bit of knowledge, today to warm up our brains
Welcome to Round 19 of the Cryptotrivial 2021 contest!
Question 19: A systematic analysis to evaluate how safe a system, smart contract, or blockchain is agaisnt attacks or technical failures.
The correct answer of Round 18 is...
Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...
Race attack!
What is a Race attack:
Last Round had a tricky correct answer due to double payment makes someone think that I was talking about double spending.
Race attack: when two transactions are created with the same funds at the same time, with the intention of spending those funds twice.
Double spending: When a given amount of coins are spent more than once. Usually as a result of a race attack or a 51% attack.
The race attack is a specific type of doublespend attempt. It requires the recipient to accept unconfirmed transactions as payment.
The attacker supplies an unconfirmed transaction to the victim that pays the victim. Meanwhile, they broadcast a conflicting transaction to the network. As the merchant saw their own transaction first, they are under the illusion of getting paid, while the rest of the network predominantly saw the doublespend first and thus it's likely the merchant will in fact not get paid.
This attack is much easier to pull off, when the attacker has a direct connection to the victim's node, and perhaps deposits the conflicting transaction directly to miners.
It is therefore recommended to turn off incoming connections to nodes used to receive payments, so that your node will seek their own peers, and not to allow the payer to directly submit the payment to the payee.
The Sybil attack takes this information asymmetry even further as the attacker isolates the victim from the network and restricts their access to information while doublespending them. Other doublespend attacks rely on having premined a transaction to yourself in a block kept secret before paying a victim with a conflicting transaction (Finney attack), or on having overwhelming hashrate (majority attack).
Previous rounds:
Round 18:
Round 17:
[https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/q4i2d4/cryptotrivial_contest_2021_round_17_smart/hfyz9mj/?context=3](https://www.reddit.co
... keep reading on reddit ➡
Hi,
Hope someone can help, we are currently struggling to get our chain to exchange contracts so we can exchange contract with Redrow on a house still being built (expected December build completion).
When we reserved the house for £1000 we had 2 days to make orders before the order deadline as the house was already almost complete.
I spoke many times with the sales advisor on email about orders, etc and asked lots of questions. I asked if I could pay via bank transfer for the orders I sent to them via email (as it was too late to order on the website due to deadlines being passed, they requested me to send email with order list).
They then manually added my email requests to the website and told me I had to pay via card on that site (costs were over £30,000).
When I went to pay I had to tick a box to agree to terms and conditions, but did not read fully as I asked most of my important questions to the sales person. On the email order form I asked the below before paying :-
>As discussed please find below all required Upgrades :-As we spoke about such a large payment and the risks associated please see below, Please could you confirm back on the below :-
>
>If for any reason our chain broke down which would be advised by solicitors, any issue with mortgage on this property or if you cancelled our order on the home then this upgrade money would be refunded ?
I was responded to with :-
>I will send the below across to site asap and confirm if they can authorise, once authorised you will need to pay immediately.
>
>As you have not exchanged, if for any reason the sale doesn't go through we will refund the options paid and £700 of the reservation fee less £300 for admin fees.
>
>I will confirm asap once authorised.
I was also confirmed this once again 5 days later on a separate query regarding the upgrades.
I am now worried they will not refund this money due to a statement I see in their terms and conditions below :-
>Please note that products ordered online via My Redrow are non-refundable, subject to limited exceptions detailed below. This means that you may not receive a refund for your order even in the event that you are unable to complete on the purchase of the home.
>
>In purchasing products prior to exchange of contracts or completion, you do so at your own risk. For the avoidance of doubt this includes products ordered online via My Redrow, by telephone or at Redrow premises.
I have ke
... keep reading on reddit ➡It's almost impossible to get a roof in these parts because teams are busy as heck.
After obtaining three estimates, I went with the company with the best reviews, full licensures, and what I deemed fair pricing.
Sent the contract back, and rejected the other three estimates (they were free, had taken their time to come out, etc.)
I also called off any further estimates to the property, when I was already on the schedule.
Company has ghosted me after contract was signed. I needed to sign to get on the schedule. I believe that they either estimated too low (it was a good price), or they are truly busy and can't fit me in because of weather concerns. We've had a lot of rain.
But they won't answer my calls, return my questions on their FB page, or even acknowledge my existence. I'm definitely not trying to be a Karen, but I lost the other prospects (the two other companies), and called off the other estimates.
So, I'm thinking of taking action.
I have been trying to ascertain whether or not to take an insurance for my deposits on Anchor Protocol from a "deposit-only" user's point of view. I don't do anything else apart from "UST Earn" (no "borrow to earn", no Mirror Protocol, no anything). While I am not tech-savvy, I have done research. Setting aside the "peace of mind" effect, I am not sure about the worthiness of those insurances currently available for Anchor which cover only smart contract failure/hacking risks (premium:2.6%) in that Anchor has been recently audited (there were some issues but resolved now), it does not do flash loans and its Earn contracts are not "sign transactions like liquidation contracts etc. Thus, while anything is possible, I feel that the realistic likelihood for these risks are not that high. In that sense, UST depeg insurance would be more useful (while not available yet) while I am aware that since the May crash Terra has made some adjustments to lower the UST depeg possibility. What do you guys think?
Hello first time ever posting on reddit so please excuse me if my post is incorrectly tagged but here is my question
I created a test contract to deploy to harmony test net (https://explorer.pops.one/#/tx/0xd17fc7a8254ee5a1ca8039ab3abe963e8e7a3e25a52a8a442a05989f905afa04)
It passes yarn test fine
https://preview.redd.it/s8515cenxsy61.png?width=1548&format=png&auto=webp&s=54fd18b6de1692ca276b96aec40b5b2f2a665b1c
and passes truffle build fine
however when going to check harmony explorer to see if my contract was deployed successfully I received a failure status.. any way i can debug this issue? any help or guidance is extremely appreciated
So I just had a thought...
Puck's memories were sealed for the duration of his contract with Emilia, now that he broke it he has been getting them back it seems ... so what if the same happened back in season 1 when Emilia died?
Could it be that the whole "as per our contract, I will now freeze the world solid" was not actually part of his contract with Emilia, but the original one to protect her from afar?
... just had to mention it somewhere cuz it kinda blew my mind. What do you think?
